Emily Watkins is.. something.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh, I'm SOOOOO sorry that our fun is interrupting your alcoholism. Feel free to down another bottle of wine alone in the corner while muttering about how you're so much more sophisticated than the rest of us.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I don't think we need to amplify one of the worst opinion columns written in a hot minute. This reminds me of that guy who wanted to shame every adult who uses a backpack, as some kind of fashion faux pas. Both of these people can get bent. Games are fun. Backpacks are practical.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    There used to be a convention of having authors who would, at least occasionally, write deliberately-enraging opinion articles in magazines. In my experience, they were typically at the end of magazines. Maybe not outright wrong articles, but they'd make statements that many readers of the magazine would object to.

    The idea, as I understand it, was to


    and this was before social media, in the Internet-based sense of the word, developed a focus on this


    drive engagement. People would write letters to the editor complaining and arguing against it, and then the magazine could print some of these in the next issue in the letters section.

    John C. Dvorak was the most-prominent example of this that I recall


    he put articles in a few computer magazines


    and was notable in that I recall him publicly-admitting on one occasion that he did this, that it wasn't just that he happened to have controversial opinions.

    Huh. Looking at his WP article, it looks like he just died last week.

    Anyway, my point is that I could believe that publications might still have authors who do this sort of thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    She's entitled to her opinion, even if it is stupid and wrong.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    We are also entitled to ridicule her for her shitty opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Arguing against her strawman is not a productive use of anybody's time or attention, and it even further wastes the time of readers. It's not solving any problem because it's not a genuinely held opinion. It is just meaningless slop, seeking profit, filling space, devoid of any intellectual value and no different than AI slop, whether a human wrote it or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 37 points 2 weeks ago

    This Watkins person sounds like the kind of person who's just so bad at every game she now wants to ruin everyone else's fun. It's a known fact games of all kinds can be good for you in different ways, and having a playful side is often seen as a green flag in most adults too.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 2 weeks ago

    "I'm bad at games, so they should be illegal. Instead, let's drink wine!"

    Wild take, but it takes all sorts. Incidentally, I do totally agree with her about Two Truths and a Lie, although I wouldn't really call these forced ice breakers 'games'

    I find it interesting that she finds games to be so isolating and distracting from socializing, when the board game industry relies almost entirely on people getting together to play games and... socialize.

    I wonder if she knows co-operative games exist

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    This person sounds like she'd be fun at parties...

    (I mean I guess she is no longer invited to any and has fuck all clue why that might be >.>)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    There are three mentions to alcohol, one for each potential social interaction in that article. So I guess I know how the author parties typically.

    I'd rather have the games, thank you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago

    And this is why some people should be denied power. Not liking/wanting something for oneself is fine. You do you, etc.

    Wishing to forbid it to others is unconscionable.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I semi-agree only in that those are some of the worst party games.

    Usually when someone says they don't like boardgames, its because they've only ever played Monopoly , Scrabble, or Sorry which are kind of terrible to play. It seems like she falls into this category.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago*

    She's starting this complaining about a casual game of table tennis so it's not exclusively board games, it's like... the concept of playing a game? And apparently, not only as a party activity, but in general.

    Very weird take.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    I just played a solo game of Nemesis: Lockdown at my table today. Somehow I made it through without even seeing an alien.

    I hope what I’m doing in the privacy of my own home doesn’t outrage her too much.

    I’m also fifteen years sober, but I’m sure she’s drinking my share too.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    She is not even speaking about videogames, but all sort of games and sport, even quizzes. I don't know what brain rot this woman has, but she seems to just want to cuddle and talk. I absolutely respect a lifestyle and opinion, even if I disagree. But I do not respect trying to ban that for other people. That crosses the line into evil. Actually she sounds like an evil Marvel character who hates Joker. Maybe Joker played with her a game to destroy her mind or something like that. Clearly this is not normal.

    Edit: 2 days later I read this old comment... and realized Joker isn't even a Marvel character. Oh boy, thank god nobody else noticed it.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago

    Bait used to be believable.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    Everyone over the age of 12 should stop doing things they enjoy and get drunk instead? Okay, fuck off Emily.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    I just hate the rules lawyer cheaters. It is usually the person who brings the game up in the first place. They scrutinize every move you make then when you catch them doing something slick, they say something like "thats how we played growing up". My mom is one of these people.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Let me guess, TheGuardian has been declining and panicked by hitting the "publish a stupid article that is so outrageous it will definitely ruin the authors career but the outrage clicks might get enough ad revenue to line the CEOs pockets by one more dollar" button.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    This could've been a tweet. Sad to see economy is so bad The Guardian has to post engagement bait.

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    What an eminently unfun-sounding person. People that carve out such a broad category to gatekeep always confuse me. You don't like competitive games? There's cooperative ones. Annoyed by people who take it too seriously? Try a more casual one. Etc...

    There's nothing wrong with being stuck in your ways or preferring more simple social activities. But refusing to try whatever the consensus of a group is, or judging others for participating is some peak boomer shit. And condescending things others enjoy as only being for children is the chef's kiss. Again, she's allowed her opinions and preferences, but I certainly don't want her joyless ass playing a game with me either...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    It's not even just games apparently. Any activity with friends that doesn't involve the consumption of mind altering legal substances (yes, coffee IS a mild altering substance), is apparently off the menu.

    And it's not even her refusal to do these activities that's mind boggling, but the fact that she thinks it's okay to enforce it. Honey... you're free to ruin your social connections with your stubbornness, but wanting to legislate fun out of existence just makes you a cunt.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    Who cares what an obnoxious, self absorbed party girl has to say? Have another glass of wine and keep your mouth shut.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    lol what is it with educated white British women and their obsession with wine? Are people in the UK so boring that you need to stay inebriated to have a conversation?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    lol. 100% death on that hill.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Just in case you thought that this is an outlier rather than a part of a series of scorching hot takes, here's some examples:

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    Ragebait, pure and simple.

    Most of us interpret "a hill I will die on" as holding an opinion that we know some people disagree with, but that we believe so strongly that we'll fight for it.

    Many of the articles in this series seem to interpret it as knowingly taking the stupidest, pettiest opinion that has ever occurred to them and deliberately overstating it so that others want to kill them.

    Also, even as an Aussie who prefers Vegemite to Marmite, that last article in the list can burn in a dumpster fire for multiple reasons. So job well done, I suppose.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    The hill I will die on: Emily Watkins shouldn't be allowed to write. Not even a fucking post it note, let alone for a self-proclaimed news portal.

    Tens, hundreds of thousands of people would have their lives immediately improved if she never held a pen, or graced a keyboard with her presence ever again.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    The whole time I was worried she lived in my country and then I got to the bottom and found out she loved in London. Great, it can keep her!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago*

    “Emily Watkins is a freelance writer based in London”

    Naturally, as a Guardian journalist I expected her wikipedia page to be full of blue links to relatives, but there doesn’t seem to be one. Have they actually started AI generating metropolitan elite scions with absolutely no life experience to generate ragebait?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I get it, people should come together and socialise rather than play games... I mean, I can kinda see the logic. But, sometimes I just wanna murder aliens. Currently playing Saints Row 4, one of the stupidest games of all time. You can murder people in the streets, but they're all holograms or aliens. You can't canonically hurt anyone in this game, as far as I can tell. Well, my character just got punched by another human character for uttering the words "poodle skirt" (IYKYK) (also, Kinzie is awesome).

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Watkins is specifically complaining about people playing games socially.

    She also isn't talking about video games. She's talking about physical sports, card games, parlour games, and pub quizzes.

    It's also absurd ragebait.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    My supernatural farming sim has done nothing wrong its whole life!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›