Worry not, even though possession of CSAM should be a permanent bar; I'm sure Trump's lawyers are already writing up something to get the Tate bros citizenship!

I'd say half.

The other half is truly so clueless that they think "both sides are the same and we need to find the middle ground". Which in itself is a major bastardisation of the doctrine of compromise (which says that in a sane system, often the best solution is a compromise between differing parties).

However that doctrine cannot apply to debates about human rights, as one cannot compromise on those.

Centrists ARE usually clueless enough to blend things together as such...

"The best" depends on what you really need.

Authentik and Authelia are two of the top most quoted solutions, but they aim to be an "everything in one" package, with tons of features a simple homelab will rarely need. They're aimed more at enterprise-like setups.

On the other end of the spectrum you have e.g. Pocket-ID, which only does OIDC by itself (you can hook up an LDAP server as user database though); but that tradeoff means it uses little to no CPU time, and, in my experience, around 130MB RAM. Given RAM is getting more expensive than gold, one needs to consider memory footprint, especially for older homelab setups. We can't all be running 256GB nodes after all.

So instead of hunting the mythical "best" solution, decide what features you really need, grab a list of providers that cover those features, and compare them to see what fits your needs best.

This ain't the X-Men crossover I was hoping for...

but no complaints.

Sir, a second blockade just hit the strait

For the love of all that's good and proper, PPEASE SPECIFY WHICH LIST.

Anyone who's even just a day out of the loop will think you're aching to be a member of the Epstein class.

The only thing he's close to is another rush of diarrhea into his Depends.

Funny thing is that we have multiple examples of these AI fine-tunes backfiring spectacularly.

For example all the Grok fails on Xitter, and Elon promising to fix those results constantly, without any of those sticking.

I think the bigger problem is that there's a segment of the population that's gotten so dependent on "AI" (LLM chatbots), they literally can't learn without it. Even the most mundane things they could've easily looked up via a search engine, end up as a question to ChatGPT. And no matter how many times you show them that the chatbot gave insanely wrong results, they're still going to use it.

It's incredibly vague still, that's the problem.

Like, I see, if I wanted to roll my own shitcoin, I can't publish the source code of it on Codeberg.

But, say, a Blockchain lookup app - technically it's a cryptocurrency related project, but at the end of the day it's just an app that connects to a public API and lists data from it. Is it also banned?

Or, I make an open source smart clock, from an LED matrix and an ESP32. This smart clock can link to YouTube/Twitch/etc. for viewer count, to GitHub for project stars/forks, to currency exchanges, and one includes a crypto exchange rate tracker for displaying current mainstream coin valuations (say, the top 5 most used coins). Is this project, since it's crypto related, banned?

Or let's say I come up with something blockchain adjacent, that could be utilised for cryptocurrency use... and what if I just publish a new cryptographic approach that then gets used by a new cryptocoin that suddenly becomes famous?

Or if my project uses a cryptographic system that comes from a dependency that was broken out of a cryptocurrency project?

Where do we draw the line of "related"? What level of relationship is allowed with the world of cryptocurrency? What degree of separation is deemed appropriate?

O'Brien MD

And it's just Colm Meaney randomly walking around hospitals being rude, sassy and sarcastic to patients, popping liver regrowth pills because of his drinking.