▲ 1355 ▼ End of an era? (discuss.online) submitted 1 month ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/games@lemmy.world 385 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (2 children) I could just as well point to dumb people giving them their money as the reason. At the end it is more complicated than such a simplistic reductions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dustyData@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 child) Victim blaming is never a good take. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago You don't even have to get high-mindedly preachy, it's a bad take on its own terms, since it hinges on the notion that the population at large are all "dumb" and therefore deserve bad things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (2 children) Not really, no. Infinite growth is impossible on a finite planet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago Growth in this context isn't measured by physical objects; it's an increase in subjective value. So we've experienced high growth since the stone age, even though we've gotten almost no new stones. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CriticalThought@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago While I agree in practice (and the resultant harm is real), in theory mathematical limits exist. (And this is without appealing to the idea that humans might eventually not be limited to a single planet.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 child) Victim blaming is never a good take. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago You don't even have to get high-mindedly preachy, it's a bad take on its own terms, since it hinges on the notion that the population at large are all "dumb" and therefore deserve bad things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago You don't even have to get high-mindedly preachy, it's a bad take on its own terms, since it hinges on the notion that the population at large are all "dumb" and therefore deserve bad things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (2 children) Not really, no. Infinite growth is impossible on a finite planet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago Growth in this context isn't measured by physical objects; it's an increase in subjective value. So we've experienced high growth since the stone age, even though we've gotten almost no new stones. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CriticalThought@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago While I agree in practice (and the resultant harm is real), in theory mathematical limits exist. (And this is without appealing to the idea that humans might eventually not be limited to a single planet.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago Growth in this context isn't measured by physical objects; it's an increase in subjective value. So we've experienced high growth since the stone age, even though we've gotten almost no new stones. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CriticalThought@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago While I agree in practice (and the resultant harm is real), in theory mathematical limits exist. (And this is without appealing to the idea that humans might eventually not be limited to a single planet.) permalink fedilink source parent