top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 170 points 2 years ago (1 child)

random people having this kind of influence on international conflicts because they have a lot of money is good and healthy and okay

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The free market will create another satellite network if musk's isn't right! /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    This but kind of unironically, him doing this makes it much more likely the US government will blow some of its military budget to fund some sort of competitor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    “One of the advantages is the huge amount of innovation coming out of the private sector, which the government wants to leverage to stay ahead of China and others,” said Brian Weeden, the director of program planning at the Secure World Foundation, a think tank.

    Well if the government had invested in its space and innovation programs they wouldn't have to rely on the private sector.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Honestly I’m kind of glad that they didn’t. Imagine if the US government had even more control and surveillance potential over the internet. I know they already basically have 100% but, I dunno, a network of low-Earth-orbit satellites constantly hovering overhead, covering every square centimetre of the earth, is a bit scary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think the same network in the hands of an unstable billionaire is an improvement. Given the choice I'd rather the U.S. have control of the network.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You make a good point… what a choice, huh?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think this one is much easier to look at if I restate the choice:

    "A single individual billionaire who has only his self interest in mind has control over the internet "

    vs.

    "An organization consisting of more than one person, who are voted to power, who must hold their own interests in mind as well as their doners at minimum"

    Personally, even if it's a whole bunch of different billionaires fighting for power, the government ultimately has to answer to more than one person. That makes it an inherently better choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Which government? Do you imagine that the vast network of live-feed surveillance satellites run by the various arms of the US intelligence services and military is under the slightest control of the elected government?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    What a shit article. Is it a job requirement that anyone at WaPo writing about Musk turns everything into fawning praise? Almost none of the article is about the incident itself, the majority of it is just rehashing all the things Musk's companies have done while crediting him for it (lol) and completely burying that the book alleges he shut down the internet during the drone attack after being in contact with senior Russian officials.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It’s pretty much an advert for his biography lol. It’s going to have a bunch of clickbaity stories which look as though they may be critical of Musk, but it turn out that he’s the good guy, after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Thankfully a biography won’t be necessary. The dipshit lived his entire life on social media and revealed to everyone just how much of an idiot he is. He really liked when people revered him like some kind of super human but now that’s all done. He can’t ever get it back so he’s resorting to courting Nazis and trolls. They’re the only ones left still tongue punching his rectum and he’s addicted to the feeling. Too bad. He’s only going to get more old, more fat, more pathetic. His money can buy him so much but he can’t buy public sentiment and the internet is merciless. It will never bend the knee to any one person. Even the richest man is powerless.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago

    Wow he is so subtle. What a genius move that no one expected. /s

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    That's how you put yourself on the CIA and KGBs watch list

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I'm guessing that as a supervillain (as @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca pointed out), Musk expects the CIA and NSA to have nice thick dossiers on him. Since Musk has Putin on speed dial, the KGB probably shares their file and asks him for updates.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Literal supervillain behaviour

  • source
  • [+] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I mean.. that's what the government, more so the political self interest in those of power wanted. Funding for NASA reduced and that easily could have done what SpaceX has accomplished, to pandering and almost begging Elon to get things done.

    The system is beautiful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    But the recounting of the incident is a reminder of how SpaceX — and its founder — amassed enormous power and leverage as its competitors proved incapable of keeping up with a dizzying pace of innovation.

    “One of the advantages is the huge amount of innovation coming out of the private sector, which the government wants to leverage to stay ahead of China and others,” said Brian Weeden, the director of program planning at the Secure World Foundation, a think tank.

    SpaceX started providing Starlink internet service to Ukraine after Russia’s invasion, creating a lifeline for the country when its communications systems had largely been knocked out.

    “Despite being the launch provider with the most proven track record and the lowest prices in the industry, SpaceX was seemingly not considered by Amazon,” the suit alleges.

    “SpaceX has been truly innovative in several key areas, launch and large constellation broadband internet — two things people have long dreamed of but have been tried and failed before,” Weeden said.

    A good portion of that success stems from Musk himself, who works relentlessly and pushes his teams to as well, attempting to overcome seemingly insurmountable odds.


    The original article contains 1,360 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    If you are hitting a paywall, remember to turn off scripts for this particular site on ublock origin

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Waiting for him to have an "accident"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That is a very unflattering photo. lol

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Paywalled articles are such a bummer. I understand why they exist, but hoarding knowledge sucks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    People have a lot of family over there. A lot of folks are really upset.

    I wonder how much more before people have an extreme reaction to him personally.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Starlink's dominant revenue stream is the US military. It's seen as a moderately strategic program by the US as they attempt to saturate specific orbits of strategic value with US assets to prevent China from using those orbits.

    If Musk actually did this, then he did it with the knowledge and likely the direction of the US military. The alternative is that he didn't do this but the story is being planted as part of a propaganda campaign in which Musk is playing the role of right-wing mobilizer.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    They're hand in glove, that's for sure. Any attempt to paint Musk or any other haute bourgeois as separate from the capitalist state is intended to confuse readers and hide the material relations in capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    All Musk has to do to answer this is to say outages occur in satellite networks all the time. But, I'll suppose he'll remain silent until someone charges him with something. Would be nice to have a witness on this stupid SOB

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›