top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mouse -> Mice

Louse -> Lice

House -> Hice

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    ox - oxen
    box - boxen
    equinox - equinoxen
    xerox - xeroxen

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Die - Dice
    Pie - Pice
    Tie - Tice
    Lie - Lice

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Check out this sweet moof!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Language is descriptive, so there’s nothing stopping you from using “rooves”, other than what typically results from using words others may not understand. Get enough people over long enough a timeline, and “rooves” becomes the norm, and “roofs” becomes archaic. Just gotta put in the effort.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Linguistics is a descriptive science.

    Language though is not science, it's a cultural practice. Adhering to a specific set of rules to signal belonging to a specific cultural subgroup is perfectly normal; and deviation from those rules is not a socially neutral act. When and how you deviate signals a lot of things about you and what you're saying.

    That's why slang is fascinating. It always tells a story. Whether it's English Prep School jargon that breached containment, whitewashed AAVL, group in-jokes, unconventional emojis, etc., a slang word says a lot about the person who uses it.

    That is to say, if you unironically start saying "rooves", I can't say whether you'll start a trend that will ultimately change English forever (weirder things have happened). But I can assure you that the immediate effect will be that people will label you "tumblr weirdo". Which would be a correct assessment, so that's effective subtextual communication. Yay linguistics!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I think I've been saying rooves my whole life. I don't think I'd generally write it that way, but it feels more natural to say.

    If I have, I'm not sure anyone's noticed. My speech patterns are odd though, so it might not be terribly noticable. It's also possible I've never had to say the word. It's not common that you need to pluralize roof.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    My personal one of these is just saying "I'll" as a response to questions like "Will you ...?" or "Who will ...?".

    If it's a contraction of "I will", it should work, but somehow it sounds weird, like it disrupts the expected pattern of emphasis.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because the English language is known for its rigid consistency of pluralization.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    This dude thinks that the singular of hooves is "hoove"

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    I am Groof.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    rooves and roofs are both accepted as correct though? Roofs being the standard is a pretty new thing, and not the more common one everywhere

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wiktionary says it changed in the 17th century, so depending on your definition of "new", sure. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/roofs

    It doesn't sound weird to me personally, although it does look weird when written out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Okay, but think about this: Groofy.

    As soon as I typed that, I changed my mind. No longer defending groof.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They're on the roof, they've found the groof

    Vulfmon - Disco Snails (YT)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Would most native speakers actually pronounce "rooves" differently from "roofs"? Is "grooves" already pronounced differently from a hypothetical "groofs"?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    f is the voiceless labiodental fricative and v is the voiced labiodental fricative.

    Basically for roofs your vocal cords don't vibrate on the final f sound. For rooves your vocal cords vibrate on the final v sound.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I know the difference between f and v, the question is whether it makes a difference in this specific case and if yes, whether most native English speakers actually know that. I'm not a native English speaker and words that end in -ooves aren't that common (when is the last time you said "grooves" or "hooves"?).

    English is famously inconsistent about how written letters are pronounced, and there are a lot of accents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    the plural of roof should be roof. fite me

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    milf - milves

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    We are groof.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I propose we use roofies! It sounds cute and probably isn't taken already.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The trooves are out there.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›