647
groof (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/curatedtumblr@sh.itjust.works
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Language is descriptive, so there’s nothing stopping you from using “rooves”, other than what typically results from using words others may not understand. Get enough people over long enough a timeline, and “rooves” becomes the norm, and “roofs” becomes archaic. Just gotta put in the effort.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I can groof to that!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ew! Perv.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Linguistics is a descriptive science.

    Language though is not science, it's a cultural practice. Adhering to a specific set of rules to signal belonging to a specific cultural subgroup is perfectly normal; and deviation from those rules is not a socially neutral act. When and how you deviate signals a lot of things about you and what you're saying.

    That's why slang is fascinating. It always tells a story. Whether it's English Prep School jargon that breached containment, whitewashed AAVL, group in-jokes, unconventional emojis, etc., a slang word says a lot about the person who uses it.

    That is to say, if you unironically start saying "rooves", I can't say whether you'll start a trend that will ultimately change English forever (weirder things have happened). But I can assure you that the immediate effect will be that people will label you "tumblr weirdo". Which would be a correct assessment, so that's effective subtextual communication. Yay linguistics!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I think I've been saying rooves my whole life. I don't think I'd generally write it that way, but it feels more natural to say.

    If I have, I'm not sure anyone's noticed. My speech patterns are odd though, so it might not be terribly noticable. It's also possible I've never had to say the word. It's not common that you need to pluralize roof.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    My personal one of these is just saying "I'll" as a response to questions like "Will you ...?" or "Who will ...?".

    If it's a contraction of "I will", it should work, but somehow it sounds weird, like it disrupts the expected pattern of emphasis.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent