all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 49 points 1 year ago

That sucks! Those are two amazing games. Sorry to hear that the co-founders are feuding...

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    How good are these games? Are they worth buying before the delisting just to have them?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I played both, loved them but I understand it's not for everyone, given the creepy/dark atmosphere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The creepy/dark atmosphere is actually the thing that appeals to me about them! It's the platforming and puzzles I am worried about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Platforming is not supposed to be tricky and the puzzles are really well designed and manageable (I usually look up puzzle solutions after a few minutes and never had the urge during Limbo or Inside).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I haven't played inside, but limbo is absolutely fantastic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Both look really cool, but I am really not a big platformer guy so I'm unsure. Inside is 90% off on GOG though so might pick it up for a dollar and a half. Limbo is full price and even though it's just $10 I don't know that I'd like it enough. How hard is the platforming and the puzzles?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    they're not really platformers like, eg. Mario, they're a lot slower with the focus being on environmental puzzles (levers, boxes, elevators, avoiding obvious enemy sight etc), with the occasional escape sequences here and there. The puzzles aren't really any sort of headscratchers, basically "how do I get there? oh, I drop this box to break the floor here (telegraphed hard)"

    If Little Nightmares -series is familiar, they're basically like that. While the puzzles aren't hard, they're generally timed to allow the obvious enemy to get close enough for the player to "pucker up" a bit and then flee the scene with a relief.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I really enjoyed them, but I wouldn't say there's any replayablility there. I enjoy the dark atmosphere and a lot of the fun for me was just the discovery and seeing what sort of creepy stuff coming next. Once the games were finished I didn't feel the urge to play them again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Limbo is the archetypal "scared little guy in big scary world dark artsy platform-puzzle indy game". Personally I found it overrated. Nice enough art style, but nothing of substance - extremely basic gameplay, no plot. Just a series of scary monsters killing you until you trial-and-error your way to the next section.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

    What is difference between any platform like itch or GOG if they will also delist games? Game preservation my ass, piracy is the true preservation.

    EDIT: Relevant video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-ejBTJeu74

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    GOG and itch’s approach to preservation is always gonna be limited by legality, you can’t keep a game on your platform if the publisher requests its delisting; ofc piracy isn’t constrained by this, so it’s inherently better at preservation

    at least, since the games on there don’t have DRM, once you have them you keep them (and with GOG, you can also download offline installers that you can reuse on any computer you want). they make piracy (and therefore preservation) way easier in that way, because pirates don’t even need to repack the game!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    GoG is very much about the marketing of game preservation. That said, to my knowledge, they (like Steam) don't remove it from your account. Just from the store. So if you bought it, you can still play it.

    GoG is a bit better in that their DRM model only requires you to authenticate to download, not reinstall. So you can theoretically archive all of your purchases if you have way more storage than you should. But it also is horrible at surfacing when an installer has an update so... mostly this is only viable for truly dead games.

    I like GoG a lot as a platform but it has always rubbed me wrong that they pretend they are focused on game preservation. But that also might be because I am old enough to remember The French Monk incident.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It’s DRM free. Just practice good backups man. No need to jump to piracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    What about the next generation of kids that want to play old classics, or just plain ol patient gamers that never got to it? If it's just people that have private personal backups, then it'll eventually die with them and be lost forever to time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments