you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

I've never read the books, but... It was clear from game 3 that she was going to play an important role in the future. The entire plot of the main campaign in Witcher 3 was about HER powers. The Wild Hunt wanted her, not Geralt.

Plus also she's awesome anyway. What the fuck is wrong with people? Oh I can't enjoy my vibeo game with a wahmen as main character, it'll ruin my mood!

Honestly I'd rather be looking at a cute girl dashing around than an old man, even if I identify more with the latter. Video games are for exploring things. Fantasy worlds, dragons, wraiths... And the biggest problem with suspending disbelief is playing a character who isn't the same gender as the player? lmao.

Maybe I'm just not enough of a gamer. Only been two and a half decades or so since I first touched a computer and played games.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I've only played Witcher 3, and I thought it was obvious that it's Ciri's story being told from the perspective of the supporting cast, and that is an incredibly cool literary device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yeah. I haven't played 1 much beyond the first 10 minutes, was too janky. 2 was mostly focused on the war, with Geralt being the most important character IMO. In 3 he was no longer THE most important character, but he was a close second - out of a large cast of supporting characters that aided them on the way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Plus also she’s awesome anyway. What the fuck is wrong with people? Oh I can’t enjoy my vibeo game with a wahmen as main character, it’ll ruin my mood!

    That's what I don't understand, like, have people not played the Horizon games? They're awesome, they're fun as hell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’m trying to remember the first game I played with a female lead and I think it was portal. And that woman didn’t speak. Strangely the next was transistor and she technically didn’t speak either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Female protags are rare. They used to be epic loot, but it's getting better now.

    I guess it's Portal for me too. Then Oblivion with a female character with that golden armor from shivering isles for shiny boobs. I was a horny teen and porn was getting boring lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    People like Geralt, they like his brooding attitude. Making. Game about ciri means they don’t get a game with Geralt. And they really want another game with him for some reason.

    Idk why they blame woke though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Tomb Raider. That's all I'm gonna say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tomb Raider is not a woman protagonist game though, at least in the first game they wanted to have Indiana Jones but didn't got the rights to it. So the developers replaced the assets with a female.

    In whole series there is not much that makes her a woman, more like an American gun-maniac guy that looks like a girl.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The first game didn't have much in the way of story. The focus was on the puzzles and adventuring. I don't think that makes her less of a woman character. In a video game, the assets are the only difference, anyway. Not that women can't be rough and adventurous and physical and like guns.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I didn't played the game or read the books but I think if you are playing a game that is called Witcher and the Witcher himself is missing that is a big issue.

    Normally you would get a new game with a new title but big companies want to use the IP and think using a known title is always better than coming up with a new title.

    As I said I didn't played Witcher 3 so dunno if it makes sense, but I wouldn't be surprised if people are unhappy when their main character is missing in the game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I guess if they didn't read the books, watch the show, or play the most popular and most recent game in the series, then it is fairly reasonable for them to be confused as they won't know shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yeah so others already explained it to you, but I'll give you a quick summary.

    Witcher is kind of a job title, but to get in you pretty much join a cult that gives you mutagens that give you cool powers, but also make you infertile and I believe resistant to STDs (this is why Geralt fucks so much).

    Ciri trained with the witchers of the Wolf school. I don't remember if she went through the mutations or not, but she has elder blood so she's already more powerful than Geralt. She's part of an end of the world prophecy. She's also essentially Geralt's adoptive daughter.

    By the end of Witcher 3, Geralt is getting kind of tired. There's literally no other Witcher in the universe more deserving to be the next lead than the spacetime manipulating princess who doesn't even want to inherit her real father's continent spanning empire because she'd rather be a badass Witcher.

  • source
  • parent