▲ 404 ▼ Nintendo ‘warned to expect 145% tariff on Nintendo Switch 2’ (www.videogameschronicle.com) submitted 1 year ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world 82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (1 child) Only 4.125% of the world population is affected. No biggy. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Evotech@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Delusional. They are going to spread that cost over everyone permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago (2 children) If they tried to spread the cost amongst everyone no one would buy the switch is already borderline unreasonably expensive. Limiting the price increase to only the tariffed country means they'll only lose out on the American market not the everyone else in the world market, which is bigger. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) But why expensive? It’s 30$ more than the steam deck and has much more power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago It's not more powerful than the steam deck. The steam deck is a portable computer the switch can only play switch games. Those games are hugely expensive, and the price is controlled by nintendo who infamously never decrease their game prices even after 10 years. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Evotech@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (1 child) And just give up America entirely? Nah permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) But I repeat myself. Seriously I just explained why they don't have a choice, and you're like, nah they're still going to do it, even though I literally explained why that can't happen. Did you even read my comment? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Evotech@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, a random lemmygoer explained it? I guess there’s no opening for discussion then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago It's not about discussion. There isn't two opinions here there is the fact they're not doing that and me explaining why they're not doing that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the tariff is too great the cost becomes unspreadable. Spreading cost requires other regions to still afford the new price, and with numbers like this that's unlikely. About one-third of Switches were sold in the US. Spreading a 145% tariff means hiking everyone's prices by 40-50%. That will murder sales in other regions. Better to eat a 30% temporary loss that adds pressure on Trump to reverse-course than to eat an even higher loss and face backlash worldwide for making others pay for Trumps idiocy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OverTheFiniteSun@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago To add to this: I'm in a region where the base Switch 2 price is already very unaffordable when you compare it with our wages and cost of living. And then you throw in the games... which Nintendo conveniently left out prices of for us (they did list the bundle though, so I'm extrapolating from that). But Nintendo won't care since we're already a very small market. But if they did that in more markets to the point of being unaffordable in most places? Sales would crash. There's a reason they have a cheap region locked variant for the Japanese market. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Evotech@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Delusional. They are going to spread that cost over everyone permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago (2 children) If they tried to spread the cost amongst everyone no one would buy the switch is already borderline unreasonably expensive. Limiting the price increase to only the tariffed country means they'll only lose out on the American market not the everyone else in the world market, which is bigger. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) But why expensive? It’s 30$ more than the steam deck and has much more power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago It's not more powerful than the steam deck. The steam deck is a portable computer the switch can only play switch games. Those games are hugely expensive, and the price is controlled by nintendo who infamously never decrease their game prices even after 10 years. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Evotech@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (1 child) And just give up America entirely? Nah permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) But I repeat myself. Seriously I just explained why they don't have a choice, and you're like, nah they're still going to do it, even though I literally explained why that can't happen. Did you even read my comment? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Evotech@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, a random lemmygoer explained it? I guess there’s no opening for discussion then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago It's not about discussion. There isn't two opinions here there is the fact they're not doing that and me explaining why they're not doing that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the tariff is too great the cost becomes unspreadable. Spreading cost requires other regions to still afford the new price, and with numbers like this that's unlikely. About one-third of Switches were sold in the US. Spreading a 145% tariff means hiking everyone's prices by 40-50%. That will murder sales in other regions. Better to eat a 30% temporary loss that adds pressure on Trump to reverse-course than to eat an even higher loss and face backlash worldwide for making others pay for Trumps idiocy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OverTheFiniteSun@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago To add to this: I'm in a region where the base Switch 2 price is already very unaffordable when you compare it with our wages and cost of living. And then you throw in the games... which Nintendo conveniently left out prices of for us (they did list the bundle though, so I'm extrapolating from that). But Nintendo won't care since we're already a very small market. But if they did that in more markets to the point of being unaffordable in most places? Sales would crash. There's a reason they have a cheap region locked variant for the Japanese market. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago (2 children) If they tried to spread the cost amongst everyone no one would buy the switch is already borderline unreasonably expensive. Limiting the price increase to only the tariffed country means they'll only lose out on the American market not the everyone else in the world market, which is bigger. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) But why expensive? It’s 30$ more than the steam deck and has much more power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago It's not more powerful than the steam deck. The steam deck is a portable computer the switch can only play switch games. Those games are hugely expensive, and the price is controlled by nintendo who infamously never decrease their game prices even after 10 years. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Evotech@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (1 child) And just give up America entirely? Nah permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) But I repeat myself. Seriously I just explained why they don't have a choice, and you're like, nah they're still going to do it, even though I literally explained why that can't happen. Did you even read my comment? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Evotech@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, a random lemmygoer explained it? I guess there’s no opening for discussion then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago It's not about discussion. There isn't two opinions here there is the fact they're not doing that and me explaining why they're not doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) But why expensive? It’s 30$ more than the steam deck and has much more power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago It's not more powerful than the steam deck. The steam deck is a portable computer the switch can only play switch games. Those games are hugely expensive, and the price is controlled by nintendo who infamously never decrease their game prices even after 10 years. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago It's not more powerful than the steam deck. The steam deck is a portable computer the switch can only play switch games. Those games are hugely expensive, and the price is controlled by nintendo who infamously never decrease their game prices even after 10 years. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Evotech@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (1 child) And just give up America entirely? Nah permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) But I repeat myself. Seriously I just explained why they don't have a choice, and you're like, nah they're still going to do it, even though I literally explained why that can't happen. Did you even read my comment? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Evotech@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, a random lemmygoer explained it? I guess there’s no opening for discussion then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago It's not about discussion. There isn't two opinions here there is the fact they're not doing that and me explaining why they're not doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) But I repeat myself. Seriously I just explained why they don't have a choice, and you're like, nah they're still going to do it, even though I literally explained why that can't happen. Did you even read my comment? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Evotech@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, a random lemmygoer explained it? I guess there’s no opening for discussion then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago It's not about discussion. There isn't two opinions here there is the fact they're not doing that and me explaining why they're not doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Evotech@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, a random lemmygoer explained it? I guess there’s no opening for discussion then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago It's not about discussion. There isn't two opinions here there is the fact they're not doing that and me explaining why they're not doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago It's not about discussion. There isn't two opinions here there is the fact they're not doing that and me explaining why they're not doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the tariff is too great the cost becomes unspreadable. Spreading cost requires other regions to still afford the new price, and with numbers like this that's unlikely. About one-third of Switches were sold in the US. Spreading a 145% tariff means hiking everyone's prices by 40-50%. That will murder sales in other regions. Better to eat a 30% temporary loss that adds pressure on Trump to reverse-course than to eat an even higher loss and face backlash worldwide for making others pay for Trumps idiocy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OverTheFiniteSun@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago To add to this: I'm in a region where the base Switch 2 price is already very unaffordable when you compare it with our wages and cost of living. And then you throw in the games... which Nintendo conveniently left out prices of for us (they did list the bundle though, so I'm extrapolating from that). But Nintendo won't care since we're already a very small market. But if they did that in more markets to the point of being unaffordable in most places? Sales would crash. There's a reason they have a cheap region locked variant for the Japanese market. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OverTheFiniteSun@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago To add to this: I'm in a region where the base Switch 2 price is already very unaffordable when you compare it with our wages and cost of living. And then you throw in the games... which Nintendo conveniently left out prices of for us (they did list the bundle though, so I'm extrapolating from that). But Nintendo won't care since we're already a very small market. But if they did that in more markets to the point of being unaffordable in most places? Sales would crash. There's a reason they have a cheap region locked variant for the Japanese market. permalink fedilink source parent