all 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 93 points 2 years ago

On OGLE-TR-56b it only rains ironically

  • source
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    What kind of umbrella would be required in each world?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Earth - any water repellant fabric, probably synthetic

    Venus - I'd go with Teflon and extend it to the ground

    Titan - SCBA

    Neptune and HD 189733b - something hard and durable but lightweight. I'd go with titanium. Chainmaille extending to the ground.

    OGLE-TR-56b - tungsten, with a mobile support apparatus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Earth needs a bit more than fabric sometimes. Not only can that water fall in the solid phase, occasionally it moves really fast!

    A SCBA isn't an umbrella. The rain is just more conductive atmosphere though, so you'd need a higher setting on your personal heater.

    Neptune probably doesn't have ground, and HD 189733b definitely doesn't. Anything capable of surviving the pressure at that depth would probably be fine, although we don't know how large the diamonds would be or how sharp the flakes that form are. Diamond Shuriken Rain sounds like an awesome song though.

    OGLE-TR-56b also probably doesn't have any ground, but depending on how high you're flying you might want something non-stick. Tons of iron welding itself to you is possibly the worst case of wing-icing you can find in nature.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    okay. so. like... given that "diamond" is a particularly defined cyrstalline form of carbon. Does neptune rain solid diamond? wouldn't that be more like.... 'hail'?

    also. it's always fun to me reading some older scifi where they colonize venus because it looked like... how we look at mars today.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I read old scifi where Venus was full of rainforests. That's not how we see Mars today

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There was a young adult sci fi series by Asimov called 'Lucky Starr' and I remember Venus was Oceanic in that one. Old old series.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    All we could see were clouds implying rain (forests), or even more (and only) water.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Yep. I found it fascinating. I think the version I had probably had a forward from Asimov talking about how we were wrong about guesses about Venus.

    I don't remember much else from the story except this, and the big reveal of the whodunnit. (Or more accurately the how).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not one of these is "men."

    I'm starting to think that song was a lie!

    :P

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Funny thing is that there'd be enough diamonds that even the market crash of hauling a shitload of them back to earth wouldn't stop you from making absolute bank off selling them.

    Probably mostly to scientists and specialist mining companies but hey money's money.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I want to feel the nice warmth of molten iron on my shoulders. Give me that amazing summer glow only OGLE-TR-56b can provide

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wonder what diamonds created in a gas giant atmosphere look like. Neptune has crazy high wind speeds.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Why are scientists absolutely terrible at naming planets?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    naw. they just stopped naming the children after the first couple rounds of olympians.

    why name them when there's a few hundred a month? breed like rabbits, Olympians. probably out of boredom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I know that Olympians fuck like rabbits, but they only meet up once every four years. Can't be that massive of a population increase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You really think Zeus is gonna have that long of a dry spell? Never mind Aphrodite or Dionysus?

    I bet Hera is a closet freak, too. (Zeus just doesn't like the whips.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Assuming they started off as two of them 2000 years ago and Fibonacci was right about rabbit breeding habits (and Olympians mature in 4 years time and don't menopause before the age of 2000). We'd have 139423224561697880139724382870407283950070256587697307264108962948325571622863290691557658876222521294125 (500th element of the Fibonacci sequence (2000 years / 4 years = 500 Olympian breeding seasons). There'd be plenty of them to name planets after.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's like in No Man's Sky where you start out giving thoughtful names to every planet you come across, but after about twenty systems you're running into similar world types and color schemes that evoke the same names you've already used, so you just stop giving a shit and stick with the names the planets are generated with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There are approximately two metric shit tons of planets. I assume scientists have better things to do with their time than to sit around and think of names to give to every single one of those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I just assumed all the ones we would actually hear about would get named more regularly. But I guess if they're talking about a specific one, this would happen. I never really thought about how many must really be out there, but now it seems obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How do you define rain on a gas giant?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago