According to a new report from Rentals, In July, the Canadian rental market hit a record high with an average asking rent of $2,078, marking an 8.9 per cent annual increase.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 134 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If they are lucky. Getting disability anything requires 90% luck and a doctor who "has the time" to sign a few documents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    In the US, they assign doctors to evaluate you, only to see you literally struggling to walk/balance yourself, and be told you could “probably work at least 4-8 hours a week, no disability for you, moocher”.

    Nevermind that even if said mythical 4-8 hour/week, remote job existed, the pay wouldnt cover jack shit…

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 81 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    There is such a big divide between homeowners and renters. The average mortgage is 12.5years in, meaning payments are based on home prices from 2010, when canadian homes were 300k on average. That means that homeowners probably pay on average, 1200 a month while renters are paying double that amount. Younger generations are fucked.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    My landlord pays 1200$ for her mortgage and I pay 1000$ fir renting the mold infested basement !

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    In the last year my mortgage has ballooned by over 1k a month from 1600$ to 2700$. In that same period my basement tenant has seen her rent increase 0$.

    Why? Because mortgage rates and affording my house are not her problem. That's the responsibility I assumed when I bought the house. I don't intend to raise her rent now or any time in the future.

    Sadly, I keep being painted with the same brush as all the other quite frankly shitty people that call themselves landlords.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (27 children)

    What we need to do is de-incentivize the commodification of housing entirely. Really make it unprofitable to deal in homes while passing the risk for your "investment" on to the people you're exploiting.

    I'm talking about an outright ban on all corporations, foreign and domestic, from owning single family homes — corporations need offices, not homes, and shell corporations and LLCs don't even need those. Give a one year grace period, then tax all rental income collected from single-family homes at 100%. Maybe fine them each year too until they shape up.

    I'm talking about regulating rental prices on short-term rentals, and capping the annual income allowed from short-term rental units to a value indexed against minimum wage (or preferably the area's living wage, determined not by any level of government itself but by valid third party organizations).

    I'm talking an annual federal tax on properties not occupied full time by the owner or their immediate blood relative. Parent, sibling, or child. Something insane, maybe 400-800% of the home's property tax. Multiply it exponentially for each hoarded home. Throw in an exception for a second home if it's far enough from the first (people who own cottages aren't the problem, and shouldn't be penalised). But only for the second home — nobody needs two or three or four "vacation homes".

    That's how we force land-rich boomers out of the housing "market" and get homes into the hands of people who need them, who should have a right to stable housing, who are currently being blocked from the market by vampiric land leeches.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • load more comments (27 replies)
    [–] 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That's substantially more than my mortgage payment.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Landlords should be outlawed. They provide no service to society, only harm

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    They're supposed to fill the gap for people who can't afford to buy, or for whom it doesn't make sense to do so (i.e. people in town on a temporary job).

    The problem is that "landlords" these days are more towards the class of "investors" who expect rents to cover the cost of their mortgage plus additional profit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    While I don't completely agree with an outright ban imo there should be strict limits to the amount of residential property a person or corporation can own.

    No one should be making significant profit off of something so essential.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Make property ownership a shit investment.

    Cap revenue from rent to 5-10%. Tax the living fuck out of empty properties so they'll take someone, anyone. Tax higher the more properties they own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Conservative premiers across the country have abolished rent control and created a situation where the wealthy have several income properties ruining everything. Liberals are totally cool with it too. Tax domestic speculators. Encourage public housing at federal and provincial levels. Never vote Conservative.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    How are people not just breaking into the empty places and just living rent free? Like Canada is probably as cold as here and I would die in the winter if I didn't have a home.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The number of empty places is vastly overstated by people looking for somebody to blame instead of market forces.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Seriously, who tf are they renting to? There aren't that many rich people.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    It's simple! For me I either have to pay that much, be homeless, move to a tiny shitty city with no work in my field, or spend a year trying to find a decent place that isn't totally unaffordable while thousands of competing potential tenants do the same to renters with vacancies. So fun!

    My landlord upped my monthly rent $600 bucks this year because he's a cunt and knows I have no fucking choice except to pay him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It’s crazy how most of my friends are paying more for their 3 bedrooms apartment than I pay for my 5 bedrooms plus basement single home. That includes all expenses for a home owner except renovations budget. The landlords are probably abusing with skyrocket profits.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    BoC keeps raising rates so it's obvious that home owners have to raise their rental prices too. How else are they going to get more money out of their investments? Everyone's fucked unless you're rich.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Millenials and GenX are going to live on the street in their old age.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    “…asking”

    Fuck off.

    Sorry.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Fucking hell my salary isn't even enough to cover 3/4ths of that rent. Pure insanity

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›