top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 255 points 2 years ago (12 children)
  • [–] 230 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (9 children)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    In condensed matter physics, a time crystal is a quantum system of particles whose lowest-energy state is one in which the particles are in repetitive motion. The system cannot lose energy to the environment and come to rest because it is already in its quantum ground state. Because of this, the motion of the particles does not really represent kinetic energy like other motion; it has "motion without energy".

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    Theorized form of matter that could exist in the cores of neutron stars.

    Essentially matter compressed beyond a critical point where protons and neutrons break down and dissociate into quarks.

    If this quark matter contains strange quarks, then it is called strange matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I wouldn't even try to defend OP, but I once heard someone say that if you have more than four apples, then it is also definitely true that you have four apples.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    That's true in a very literal sense, but there's a whole branch of linguistics called pragmatics that's concerned with things like why it's usually safe to conclude that when someone says they have four apples, they mean that have only four apples. When there's any ambiguity I talk like a mathematician and use phrases like "at least four apples" or "exactly four apples".

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [+] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    If you can actually have a reasoned discussion about it, instead of simply getting angry at being questioned, then you are better than 90% of teachers.

    In my experience most teachers don't like being questioned, which of course is directly antithetical to their supposed vocation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 131 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "You're right Johnny! Please explain Bose-Einstein Condensates for the class."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Please explain plasma"

    explains lcd instead

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    My ass can make at least 3.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    My earth science teacher denied plasmas are a thing when I mentioned it

    This was 8th grade

    I Immediately lost all respect for her and if present day me were around for it I'd have taken her idiocy to the union rep to recommend she prove she actually has the education she claims to have had.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Middle school teachers in Texas only require a generalist certification, a Bachelor's Degree, and completion of a teacher training program to teach core subjects. That cert (which also exists for elementary school teachers) requires only a basic understanding of each core subject area. There are certifications specific to each core subject (I have Math 4th-8th, also Math 8th-12th, along with a Master's in math), but there is no guarantee you're going to get a teacher certified in their field. As such, you get teachers who don't understand their subjects at a very deep level or how what they teach connects vertically to their student's prior education in that subject and what they'll learn in future grades.

    It is a big reason why students to come to my high school classes hating math, I think, because it was confusing to them being taught by teachers who only had a moderate understanding themselves and probably taught them lots of memorization tricks and mnemonic devices instead of helping them understand their origins and why they work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 50 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    You're probably the kind of person who complains that they don't teach complex numbers when first introducing square roots in school.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] [S] 41 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not really no. It's a meme. Although, now that you mention it …

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    To learn to count to 10, we first have to understand quaternions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I pretty distinctly remember being introduced to square roots at the same or nearly the same time as complex numbers. Obviously we didn't do the whole Complex Numbers Extended Cinematic Universe, but I think my class did learn to solve quadratics with complex roots in middle school.

    I mean I did go to Catholic middle school, but I don't think the math education was that weird.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Preferably you want to note it's existence on the way past. But leave it there.

    It's one of the maths areas that is complex enough to wow them, while still simple enough for some to research on their own.

    You could also wait for the first smart Alec to ask about negative square roots, blow their brain with a quick simplified answer, and move on.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    How about Bose-Einstein condensate?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "There are actually 72 different states, but let's focus on the first 3"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yep, this was me, but it was pointing out the particle wave duality of light. Needless to say I was mocked by the teacher and students.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    I disagree. In physics, you choose the simplest model that works for a particular purpose. If it is enough to assume that there are three phases, then that's the simplest model that works, and therefore the "correct" one to use. A model that has four phases is, then, bloated.

  • source
  • [+] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    My high school taught the quantum mechanical model of the atom instead of whatever simplified model most high schools teach.

    I found out this was a huge advantage taking university chemistry because I was like "cool this is all review I'm gonna ace this," but everyone else in the class was like "what the fuck is going on this isn't what they taught us!"

    I may have messed up the curve that quarter...

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (11 children)
    load more comments (11 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›