▲ 775 ▼ School is just one simplification after the other (sh.itjust.works) submitted 2 years ago by illectrility@sh.itjust.works to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 126 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 255 points 2 years ago (8 children) pretty sure theres more than 4. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_of_matter permalink fedilink source hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 230 points 2 years ago (4 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (1 child) I identify as degenerate matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 8 points 2 years ago Degenerate lives matter permalink fedilink source parent [–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 32 points 2 years ago (3 children) "Strange matter" 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (4 children) “Time Crystal” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 years ago In condensed matter physics, a time crystal is a quantum system of particles whose lowest-energy state is one in which the particles are in repetitive motion. The system cannot lose energy to the environment and come to rest because it is already in its quantum ground state. Because of this, the motion of the particles does not really represent kinetic energy like other motion; it has "motion without energy". permalink fedilink source parent [–] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago Physics girl did a great video on this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieDIpgso4no permalink fedilink source parent [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago "Programmable Matter" tf permalink fedilink source parent [+] person@lemm.ee -14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Honestly fine with it as long as any profits aren’t privatized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've got bad news for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I’ve got good news for you. You can just email the researcher to get a free copy. Because they don’t get any of the profits from scientific journals, so they have no incentive to hoard their own research. Or hell, there’s always Anna’s Archive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago What does that to do with anything here? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Good. Maybe we can kill religion with enough physics. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 years ago Theorized form of matter that could exist in the cores of neutron stars. Essentially matter compressed beyond a critical point where protons and neutrons break down and dissociate into quarks. If this quark matter contains strange quarks, then it is called strange matter. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 years ago Stranger Things permalink fedilink source parent [–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago Glass 🙂 Superglass 😎 permalink fedilink source parent [–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago 🦸♂️ glass permalink fedilink source parent [–] illectrility@sh.itjust.works [S] 155 points 2 years ago Well first of all, fuck you smartass. But also yes, you're right permalink fedilink source parent [–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (4 children) I wouldn't even try to defend OP, but I once heard someone say that if you have more than four apples, then it is also definitely true that you have four apples. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 18 points 2 years ago That's true in a very literal sense, but there's a whole branch of linguistics called pragmatics that's concerned with things like why it's usually safe to conclude that when someone says they have four apples, they mean that have only four apples. When there's any ambiguity I talk like a mathematician and use phrases like "at least four apples" or "exactly four apples". permalink fedilink source parent [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's technically correct, like saying at least 4 people died from covid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lightdm@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago (1 child) More specifically: "4 people died from covid" is also true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nelots@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago On the other hand, adding a single world like "only" in there suddenly makes it completely false. Language is fun. permalink fedilink source parent [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* OP treating his statement as a correction requires that he’s not using this interpretation. If he were to use this defense, so could the teacher, so he’d just be changing how he’s wrong, not that he is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago What if there's a worm in one of them? Like, you think you habe more than four apples. Then you find out that most of them have worms. In the end, you are left with two apples. So now, it is not true that you have four apples. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) If you can actually have a reasoned discussion about it, instead of simply getting angry at being questioned, then you are better than 90% of teachers. In my experience most teachers don't like being questioned, which of course is directly antithetical to their supposed vocation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sounds like you just don't want your authority to be challenged. If you're wrong and a student points that out, own it. Instead you expect them to question their own knowledge while submitting to your authority for confirmation or denial. But if the student already knows, they don't need your confirmation. They need you to admit that you were incorrect, and move forward with the correct information. Otherwise you're just demonstrating that you're an authority that cannot be trusted to be fair. Authority that cannot be challenged is authority that cannot be respected. Authority must continually earn the respect of its constituents, or it will lose its power over them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago If they “know” something because they read about it elsewhere, I should be treated as a equally valid source of information because I am. But you've just proven yourself to not be an equally valid source of information because you spread misinformation. permalink fedilink source parent [+] neonred@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) solid, fluid, gaseous Solid, liquid, and gas. A fluid is something that flows. Both liquids and gasses are fluids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] neonred@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago This is the 'senses' argument, or the 'moons of Jupiter' argument. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) There is that ice that turns all other water into ice! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I mean, all ice turns "other water" into ice, as long as it's cold enough permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deepus@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Holy butt munch Batman! Why are we taught lies!? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danksy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* Because if we weren't then no class would ever learn anything, as the teaching would move at a glacial pace and cover material that isn't relevant until you start on your PhD. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dingus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) I identify as degenerate matter Edit: Whoops, someone already commented that elsewhere in the thread. Oh well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago Thanks to Lemmy's Hot algorithm though, we see your joke first! permalink fedilink source parent [–] hansl@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago It’s only a matter of opinion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 230 points 2 years ago (4 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (1 child) I identify as degenerate matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 8 points 2 years ago Degenerate lives matter permalink fedilink source parent [–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 32 points 2 years ago (3 children) "Strange matter" 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (4 children) “Time Crystal” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 years ago In condensed matter physics, a time crystal is a quantum system of particles whose lowest-energy state is one in which the particles are in repetitive motion. The system cannot lose energy to the environment and come to rest because it is already in its quantum ground state. Because of this, the motion of the particles does not really represent kinetic energy like other motion; it has "motion without energy". permalink fedilink source parent [–] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago Physics girl did a great video on this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieDIpgso4no permalink fedilink source parent [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago "Programmable Matter" tf permalink fedilink source parent [+] person@lemm.ee -14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Honestly fine with it as long as any profits aren’t privatized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've got bad news for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I’ve got good news for you. You can just email the researcher to get a free copy. Because they don’t get any of the profits from scientific journals, so they have no incentive to hoard their own research. Or hell, there’s always Anna’s Archive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago What does that to do with anything here? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Good. Maybe we can kill religion with enough physics. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 years ago Theorized form of matter that could exist in the cores of neutron stars. Essentially matter compressed beyond a critical point where protons and neutrons break down and dissociate into quarks. If this quark matter contains strange quarks, then it is called strange matter. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 years ago Stranger Things permalink fedilink source parent [–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago Glass 🙂 Superglass 😎 permalink fedilink source parent [–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago 🦸♂️ glass permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (1 child) I identify as degenerate matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 8 points 2 years ago Degenerate lives matter permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 8 points 2 years ago Degenerate lives matter permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 32 points 2 years ago (3 children) "Strange matter" 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (4 children) “Time Crystal” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 years ago In condensed matter physics, a time crystal is a quantum system of particles whose lowest-energy state is one in which the particles are in repetitive motion. The system cannot lose energy to the environment and come to rest because it is already in its quantum ground state. Because of this, the motion of the particles does not really represent kinetic energy like other motion; it has "motion without energy". permalink fedilink source parent [–] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago Physics girl did a great video on this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieDIpgso4no permalink fedilink source parent [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago "Programmable Matter" tf permalink fedilink source parent [+] person@lemm.ee -14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Honestly fine with it as long as any profits aren’t privatized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've got bad news for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I’ve got good news for you. You can just email the researcher to get a free copy. Because they don’t get any of the profits from scientific journals, so they have no incentive to hoard their own research. Or hell, there’s always Anna’s Archive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago What does that to do with anything here? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Good. Maybe we can kill religion with enough physics. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 years ago Theorized form of matter that could exist in the cores of neutron stars. Essentially matter compressed beyond a critical point where protons and neutrons break down and dissociate into quarks. If this quark matter contains strange quarks, then it is called strange matter. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 years ago Stranger Things permalink fedilink source parent
[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (4 children) “Time Crystal” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 years ago In condensed matter physics, a time crystal is a quantum system of particles whose lowest-energy state is one in which the particles are in repetitive motion. The system cannot lose energy to the environment and come to rest because it is already in its quantum ground state. Because of this, the motion of the particles does not really represent kinetic energy like other motion; it has "motion without energy". permalink fedilink source parent [–] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago Physics girl did a great video on this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieDIpgso4no permalink fedilink source parent [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago "Programmable Matter" tf permalink fedilink source parent [+] person@lemm.ee -14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Honestly fine with it as long as any profits aren’t privatized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've got bad news for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I’ve got good news for you. You can just email the researcher to get a free copy. Because they don’t get any of the profits from scientific journals, so they have no incentive to hoard their own research. Or hell, there’s always Anna’s Archive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago What does that to do with anything here? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Good. Maybe we can kill religion with enough physics. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 years ago In condensed matter physics, a time crystal is a quantum system of particles whose lowest-energy state is one in which the particles are in repetitive motion. The system cannot lose energy to the environment and come to rest because it is already in its quantum ground state. Because of this, the motion of the particles does not really represent kinetic energy like other motion; it has "motion without energy". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago Physics girl did a great video on this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieDIpgso4no permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago "Programmable Matter" tf permalink fedilink source parent
[+] person@lemm.ee -14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Honestly fine with it as long as any profits aren’t privatized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've got bad news for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I’ve got good news for you. You can just email the researcher to get a free copy. Because they don’t get any of the profits from scientific journals, so they have no incentive to hoard their own research. Or hell, there’s always Anna’s Archive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago What does that to do with anything here? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Good. Maybe we can kill religion with enough physics. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Honestly fine with it as long as any profits aren’t privatized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've got bad news for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I’ve got good news for you. You can just email the researcher to get a free copy. Because they don’t get any of the profits from scientific journals, so they have no incentive to hoard their own research. Or hell, there’s always Anna’s Archive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago What does that to do with anything here? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've got bad news for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I’ve got good news for you. You can just email the researcher to get a free copy. Because they don’t get any of the profits from scientific journals, so they have no incentive to hoard their own research. Or hell, there’s always Anna’s Archive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago What does that to do with anything here? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I’ve got good news for you. You can just email the researcher to get a free copy. Because they don’t get any of the profits from scientific journals, so they have no incentive to hoard their own research. Or hell, there’s always Anna’s Archive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago What does that to do with anything here? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago What does that to do with anything here? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Good. Maybe we can kill religion with enough physics. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 years ago Theorized form of matter that could exist in the cores of neutron stars. Essentially matter compressed beyond a critical point where protons and neutrons break down and dissociate into quarks. If this quark matter contains strange quarks, then it is called strange matter. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago Glass 🙂 Superglass 😎 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] illectrility@sh.itjust.works [S] 155 points 2 years ago Well first of all, fuck you smartass. But also yes, you're right permalink fedilink source parent
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (4 children) I wouldn't even try to defend OP, but I once heard someone say that if you have more than four apples, then it is also definitely true that you have four apples. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 18 points 2 years ago That's true in a very literal sense, but there's a whole branch of linguistics called pragmatics that's concerned with things like why it's usually safe to conclude that when someone says they have four apples, they mean that have only four apples. When there's any ambiguity I talk like a mathematician and use phrases like "at least four apples" or "exactly four apples". permalink fedilink source parent [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's technically correct, like saying at least 4 people died from covid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lightdm@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago (1 child) More specifically: "4 people died from covid" is also true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nelots@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago On the other hand, adding a single world like "only" in there suddenly makes it completely false. Language is fun. permalink fedilink source parent [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* OP treating his statement as a correction requires that he’s not using this interpretation. If he were to use this defense, so could the teacher, so he’d just be changing how he’s wrong, not that he is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago What if there's a worm in one of them? Like, you think you habe more than four apples. Then you find out that most of them have worms. In the end, you are left with two apples. So now, it is not true that you have four apples. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 18 points 2 years ago That's true in a very literal sense, but there's a whole branch of linguistics called pragmatics that's concerned with things like why it's usually safe to conclude that when someone says they have four apples, they mean that have only four apples. When there's any ambiguity I talk like a mathematician and use phrases like "at least four apples" or "exactly four apples". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's technically correct, like saying at least 4 people died from covid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lightdm@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago (1 child) More specifically: "4 people died from covid" is also true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nelots@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago On the other hand, adding a single world like "only" in there suddenly makes it completely false. Language is fun. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago (1 child) More specifically: "4 people died from covid" is also true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nelots@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago On the other hand, adding a single world like "only" in there suddenly makes it completely false. Language is fun. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago On the other hand, adding a single world like "only" in there suddenly makes it completely false. Language is fun. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* OP treating his statement as a correction requires that he’s not using this interpretation. If he were to use this defense, so could the teacher, so he’d just be changing how he’s wrong, not that he is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago What if there's a worm in one of them? Like, you think you habe more than four apples. Then you find out that most of them have worms. In the end, you are left with two apples. So now, it is not true that you have four apples. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) If you can actually have a reasoned discussion about it, instead of simply getting angry at being questioned, then you are better than 90% of teachers. In my experience most teachers don't like being questioned, which of course is directly antithetical to their supposed vocation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sounds like you just don't want your authority to be challenged. If you're wrong and a student points that out, own it. Instead you expect them to question their own knowledge while submitting to your authority for confirmation or denial. But if the student already knows, they don't need your confirmation. They need you to admit that you were incorrect, and move forward with the correct information. Otherwise you're just demonstrating that you're an authority that cannot be trusted to be fair. Authority that cannot be challenged is authority that cannot be respected. Authority must continually earn the respect of its constituents, or it will lose its power over them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago If they “know” something because they read about it elsewhere, I should be treated as a equally valid source of information because I am. But you've just proven yourself to not be an equally valid source of information because you spread misinformation. permalink fedilink source parent [+] neonred@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) solid, fluid, gaseous Solid, liquid, and gas. A fluid is something that flows. Both liquids and gasses are fluids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] neonred@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) If you can actually have a reasoned discussion about it, instead of simply getting angry at being questioned, then you are better than 90% of teachers. In my experience most teachers don't like being questioned, which of course is directly antithetical to their supposed vocation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sounds like you just don't want your authority to be challenged. If you're wrong and a student points that out, own it. Instead you expect them to question their own knowledge while submitting to your authority for confirmation or denial. But if the student already knows, they don't need your confirmation. They need you to admit that you were incorrect, and move forward with the correct information. Otherwise you're just demonstrating that you're an authority that cannot be trusted to be fair. Authority that cannot be challenged is authority that cannot be respected. Authority must continually earn the respect of its constituents, or it will lose its power over them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago If they “know” something because they read about it elsewhere, I should be treated as a equally valid source of information because I am. But you've just proven yourself to not be an equally valid source of information because you spread misinformation. permalink fedilink source parent [+] neonred@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) solid, fluid, gaseous Solid, liquid, and gas. A fluid is something that flows. Both liquids and gasses are fluids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] neonred@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sounds like you just don't want your authority to be challenged. If you're wrong and a student points that out, own it. Instead you expect them to question their own knowledge while submitting to your authority for confirmation or denial. But if the student already knows, they don't need your confirmation. They need you to admit that you were incorrect, and move forward with the correct information. Otherwise you're just demonstrating that you're an authority that cannot be trusted to be fair. Authority that cannot be challenged is authority that cannot be respected. Authority must continually earn the respect of its constituents, or it will lose its power over them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago If they “know” something because they read about it elsewhere, I should be treated as a equally valid source of information because I am. But you've just proven yourself to not be an equally valid source of information because you spread misinformation. permalink fedilink source parent [+] neonred@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) solid, fluid, gaseous Solid, liquid, and gas. A fluid is something that flows. Both liquids and gasses are fluids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] neonred@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sounds like you just don't want your authority to be challenged. If you're wrong and a student points that out, own it. Instead you expect them to question their own knowledge while submitting to your authority for confirmation or denial. But if the student already knows, they don't need your confirmation. They need you to admit that you were incorrect, and move forward with the correct information. Otherwise you're just demonstrating that you're an authority that cannot be trusted to be fair. Authority that cannot be challenged is authority that cannot be respected. Authority must continually earn the respect of its constituents, or it will lose its power over them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago If they “know” something because they read about it elsewhere, I should be treated as a equally valid source of information because I am. But you've just proven yourself to not be an equally valid source of information because you spread misinformation. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Dalvoron@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago If they “know” something because they read about it elsewhere, I should be treated as a equally valid source of information because I am. But you've just proven yourself to not be an equally valid source of information because you spread misinformation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago If they “know” something because they read about it elsewhere, I should be treated as a equally valid source of information because I am. But you've just proven yourself to not be an equally valid source of information because you spread misinformation. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] neonred@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) solid, fluid, gaseous Solid, liquid, and gas. A fluid is something that flows. Both liquids and gasses are fluids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] neonred@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) solid, fluid, gaseous Solid, liquid, and gas. A fluid is something that flows. Both liquids and gasses are fluids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] neonred@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] neonred@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago This is the 'senses' argument, or the 'moons of Jupiter' argument. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) There is that ice that turns all other water into ice! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I mean, all ice turns "other water" into ice, as long as it's cold enough permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I mean, all ice turns "other water" into ice, as long as it's cold enough permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deepus@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Holy butt munch Batman! Why are we taught lies!? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danksy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* Because if we weren't then no class would ever learn anything, as the teaching would move at a glacial pace and cover material that isn't relevant until you start on your PhD. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Danksy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* Because if we weren't then no class would ever learn anything, as the teaching would move at a glacial pace and cover material that isn't relevant until you start on your PhD. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dingus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) I identify as degenerate matter Edit: Whoops, someone already commented that elsewhere in the thread. Oh well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago Thanks to Lemmy's Hot algorithm though, we see your joke first! permalink fedilink source parent [–] hansl@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago It’s only a matter of opinion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago Thanks to Lemmy's Hot algorithm though, we see your joke first! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hansl@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago It’s only a matter of opinion. permalink fedilink source parent