top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 135 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Step 1. Invent microplastics.
Step 2. Have people ingest microplastics into their bodies.
Step 3. Evolve plastic-eating mushrooms.
Step 4. ???
Step 5. The Last of Us IRL

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 95 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I've seen this every year for a decade still not a thing

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Plastic is also such an unspecific term. In regards to biodegradability there is no reason why PE, PP, PVC, PLA, PS and all the others should behave similiarly. Aside from some form of polymerization they are entirely different chemicals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    It would actually be scary to me if an organism evolves to rapidly eat all plastic. Imagine plastic rust... ugh, its just a terrifying idea. You think mantianing a car is difficult now, wait until you have to check the integrity of any "plastic" component

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago*

    Wood didn't rot in the carboniferous era. It used to build up in dense layers that became our modern coal veins.

    At some point microorganisms evolved to exploit that vast resource. Now coal can no longer generate naturally and we have to keep wood structures dry or painted lest they be reclaimed by the Eafth.

    I don't know if there's any reason it couldn't happen to plastics. We've created the niche already, how long until something exploits it?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 87 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    As with everything that sounds too good to be true... what's the catch?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 91 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I see this every couple years (I think it's the same). The fungus can only degrade very few plastic types, like Styrofoam.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    So are we disappointed it's not the perfect solution, so we don't bother?

    Sounds like we're on the right track and someone can find a way to make money with this, or decide to dedicate their resources to it for society's benefit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    We don't bother because those few kinds of plastics aren't the ones that are causing most of the polution

    If something costs millions and only works in a limited space, at specific conditions, and recycles 0.2% of all plastics, why would anyone want to invest in it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Fantastic. Styrofoam is not recyclable like Polypropylene or even the Polyethylenes. Styrofoam ends up in landfills. I want it in mushrooms.

    It’s not the magic bullet but it’s a fucking howitzer. Yas kween.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    From other times something like this came up:

    1. The rate of conversion is too low
    2. It will only eat plastic if other carbon sources aren't available
      Probably more, this is from the top of my head. Also, this will still cause the plastic to eventually be converted into CO2 which is released in the atmosphere.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Having it actually break down into CO2, water and a few other things would be way better than it permanently contaminating our food, water and ecosystems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do you want to worry about plastic rotting like wood does?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Yes. That'd be way better than having it kill animals and contaminate our food and water to the point where you basically cant avoid it. We literally want plastic to biodegrade. Just as long as it biodegrades after we are done using it. Which would be a wonderful problem to have compared to the current state of things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    While edible the mushroom tasted like garbage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Well, everytime I see an article saying "we've found a [mushroom | bacteria | whatever] that eats plastic, yay!", I always think: well, yeah, that's great, but what about all the plastic we don't want eaten just yet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The amount of micro-plastics in everyone's blood - even in tiny remote villages that have had next to no contact with the outside world - might make human beings look like an attractive meal to them? Surely nothing bad could happen if instead of micro-plastics we all have fungus in our blood?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 73 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    That's nice and all but these are fungi release CO2 into the atmosphere just like burning it would. It's a bit counter-intuitive but burning it with carbon capture is less CO2 emitting.

    Filtering out particles is obvious requirement and easier than filtering CO2. This is all a worse solution than to simply use less plastic. Taxing plastic out of existence is the real solution.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago*

    Taxing wasteful uses and protecting life saving uses (sanitization, hospitals, etc). Is the only solution. Treat every other approach as distractions by people who want to profit from the way things are.

    Plastic is one of the greatest inventions of all time. But just like nuclear energy, it's also the most deadly to us if we are stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Man, Vincent and Jules were some really fun guys.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don't even ask. Just start releasing that shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do you want The Last of Us? Because this is how you get The Last of Us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Among a hundred other end of days scenarios.

    Know what the difference between plastic and oil? (not just crude or motor, but cooking, lubricating, buttering?)

    Let's release a designer consumer that would require very little mutation to end humanity. Do it already.

    Depending on your outlook this might just make the notion more enticing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (22 children)

    We have that. They're called "plants." If we just stop cutting down all the trees and poisoning the seas, plants will capture the carbon in the air and return it to the ground when they die. Or it will become part of the natural food chain.

    So don't worry, either we will stop destroying all of the ecosystems, or the plants can fix the planet after we're all gone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • load more comments (22 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Step 1: make everything from plastics

    Step 2: create plastic eating fungus to get rid of the trash

    Step 3: create serious damage to all parts of our society and technology, as plastic eating fungus spores get everywhere, including our food chain and your brain.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    This is really bugging me. The article claims the fungus is an edible mushroom, but Pestalotiopsis (the spores on the right) is an endophytic, microscopic ascomycete. Not a mushroom and certainly not edible. So why is there a picture of Pluteus on the left? I can only imagine the author googled "Pestalotiopsis mushroom" and grabbed the first picture that came up.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Can you eat the mushrooms later? Circle of life!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›