▲ 51 ▼ CDPR Claims Phantom Liberty Is Great Because The Dev Needed Redemption (tech4gamers.com) submitted 2 years ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/games@lemmy.world 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty has launched to positive reviews, and one reason for this quality came from CDPR's desire for redemption.
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children) Didn’t Cyberpunk launch to positive reviews as well? At this point it’s meaningless. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social [S] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) It had positive reviews on release because they wouldn’t give console copies to reviewers, and professional reviewers tended to have the beefy gaming rigs that could play it well. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Nope it didn't. It was a buggy mess on release with huge performance problems and missing features. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Katana314@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) All true - and yet somehow, it still released to positive reviews. The consumer outcry came after release, the reviewers having gotten a tightly curated experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* I'm pretty sure it didn't release to positive reviews. Unless all the positivity we're talking about is journalist reviews and not people being incredibly angry at the game In fact wasn't there a review ban on 2077's original release? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social [S] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) It had positive reviews on release because they wouldn’t give console copies to reviewers, and professional reviewers tended to have the beefy gaming rigs that could play it well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Nope it didn't. It was a buggy mess on release with huge performance problems and missing features. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Katana314@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) All true - and yet somehow, it still released to positive reviews. The consumer outcry came after release, the reviewers having gotten a tightly curated experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* I'm pretty sure it didn't release to positive reviews. Unless all the positivity we're talking about is journalist reviews and not people being incredibly angry at the game In fact wasn't there a review ban on 2077's original release? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) All true - and yet somehow, it still released to positive reviews. The consumer outcry came after release, the reviewers having gotten a tightly curated experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* I'm pretty sure it didn't release to positive reviews. Unless all the positivity we're talking about is journalist reviews and not people being incredibly angry at the game In fact wasn't there a review ban on 2077's original release? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* I'm pretty sure it didn't release to positive reviews. Unless all the positivity we're talking about is journalist reviews and not people being incredibly angry at the game In fact wasn't there a review ban on 2077's original release? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago Now just imagine the feels if you committed to quality all the time... permalink fedilink source
[–] EMPig@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago What is this? A new monetization model? Pay4Redempion? permalink fedilink source
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago All I want is a conclusion to the FF:06:B5 mystery! permalink fedilink source
[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Fool me once… permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RazorsLedge@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Fool me twice, can't get fooled again permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Phegan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RazorsLedge@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Fool me twice, can't get fooled again permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Phegan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Phegan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
all 11 comments