you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

It literally was. She had the choice to get vaccinated and get it. She choose not to and die. That is an extremely easy choice. Which part of that is not having a choice?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No, she did not choose to die

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In what world does this make sense to you. She choose to die because she didn't want the vaccine. Is point A to point B just not connecting to you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    She's not choosing to die, they're choosing to kill her

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you're choosing to jump off a cliff because it offends you to walk on a paved road and you're being offered to walk on the paved road then it really is your own fault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    You're given a very reasonable and next to no effort choice. You're choosing against that and choosing to hurt yourself by not picking that option. Except in this case you're also hurting others around you. It's like you're suggesting it's the grounds fault that she died when she choose to launch herself off the cliff, she could've just taken the paved road for no effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You have to be trolling at this point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    They're choosing not to kill 2 people instead of 1.

    It's no different to prioritising someone who has never smoked instead of a smoker. The person who doesn't smoke has a better chance of survival

  • source
  • parent