▲ 9 ▼ Expanded Trans Mountain pipeline capacity fails to lift Canadian heavy oil price (www.reuters.com) submitted 2 years ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments The Trans Mountain oil pipeline expansion (TMX) was meant to shrink the discount on Canadian oil versus U.S. crude but three months in the differential is wider than when commercial operations on the project started.
[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Blow it up permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That would be an ecological disaster. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Less than it is now permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No. Massive crude oil spilled into the watersheds of BC and Alberta would be far worse. The fact that this needs explaining to you is telling of your actual concern for the environment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago Guess you need to review the IPCC reports permalink fedilink source parent [–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 1 point 2 years ago No, it would be an ecological and humanitarian disaster. While Alberta's ecosystem is barely hanging on thanks to decades of de-facto oil industry government. BCs is struggling from climate change. Then you have to thank Pierre Pollievre and Harper for the pipeline route that passes through at least one municipal watershed. But not Nestle's watershed. They changed the route for Nestle. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That would be an ecological disaster. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Less than it is now permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No. Massive crude oil spilled into the watersheds of BC and Alberta would be far worse. The fact that this needs explaining to you is telling of your actual concern for the environment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago Guess you need to review the IPCC reports permalink fedilink source parent
[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Less than it is now permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No. Massive crude oil spilled into the watersheds of BC and Alberta would be far worse. The fact that this needs explaining to you is telling of your actual concern for the environment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago Guess you need to review the IPCC reports permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No. Massive crude oil spilled into the watersheds of BC and Alberta would be far worse. The fact that this needs explaining to you is telling of your actual concern for the environment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago Guess you need to review the IPCC reports permalink fedilink source parent
[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago Guess you need to review the IPCC reports permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 1 point 2 years ago No, it would be an ecological and humanitarian disaster. While Alberta's ecosystem is barely hanging on thanks to decades of de-facto oil industry government. BCs is struggling from climate change. Then you have to thank Pierre Pollievre and Harper for the pipeline route that passes through at least one municipal watershed. But not Nestle's watershed. They changed the route for Nestle. permalink fedilink source parent