Here’s a archive link, https://archive.ph/oT1L6

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

This is not about the concept of pokemon but using actual assets from pokemon games. Edit: not sure why I am getting downvoted for saying the top comment had nothing to do with the statement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Comparing both games I think a few creatures like Cremis are on shaky ground, but even that might turn out to be fine.

    What definitely won't go anywhere is people making mad collages to explain how a pal combines features of such plus such pokémon. They don't seem to realize that Pokémon doesn't own every possible combination of features from those creatures,

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I dunno, man. Have you seen the videos? They've got the wireframes of pals overlaid with pokemon, and the size is exactly the same. Sure, the basic shape is slightly different and some accessories have been changed, but it's very close. The one that looks like Luxray has the same exact diameter of tail in the same exact spot - the only difference is that it's a bit shorter with a different tuft at the end. Really seems that for some of these pals they just modified existing assets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments