▲ 489 ▼ Fallout TV Show - Teaser Trailer (m.youtube.com) submitted 2 years ago* by avater@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world 180 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] healer_56@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) guess i will watch it. lets hope its not complete shit permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] avater@lemmy.world [S] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) the trailer looks great and really has that fallout spirit somewhere between funny, gruesome and batshit crazy. Also great to see Walton Goggins in the cast, he's a great actor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] li10@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m on a strict “don’t trust trailers” diet since seeing the new Napoleon film, so I’ll wait and see for this series. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) What do you mean ? Is Napoleon shit; I haven't seen it yet? Please 🙏 don't be shit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago I haven't seen it yet, but one review said it was one of the most unintentionally funny movies of the year. Also Ridley Scott is doing a hilarious press tour for it. Scott was informed of some less than stellar French reviews of his film – French GQ called it “deeply clumsy” and “unintentionally funny” – to which Scott replied with the following solid gold banger: “The French don’t even like themselves.” But don’t think that insulting an entire country is enough for Scott. Speaking to the Sunday Times’s Jonathan Dean last weekend, he also reserved some ire for historians, some of whom have suggested that Napoleon might not be the most rigorously accurate film ever made. Scott responded by addressing the entire historian community. “Excuse me, mate, were you there?” he raged. “No? Well, shut the fuck up then.” permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago 'Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the f*** up then.’ Ridley Scott permalink fedilink source parent [–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) So your saying that its good but not historically accurate. I love history but I can enjoy historical fiction just as much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] li10@feddit.uk 1 point 2 years ago I thought it was bad tbh Didn’t like that it wasn’t historically accurate, but even looking past that it was just boring imo permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I love Goggins, this is a perfect universe for his style honestly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeBunnie@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago He was fantastic in Righteous Gemstones. Let's play Baby Billy's Bible Bonkers! permalink fedilink source parent [+] 4grams@awful.systems 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago They're going to find a way to release the films with bugs and release a day one patch permalink fedilink source parent
[–] avater@lemmy.world [S] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) the trailer looks great and really has that fallout spirit somewhere between funny, gruesome and batshit crazy. Also great to see Walton Goggins in the cast, he's a great actor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] li10@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m on a strict “don’t trust trailers” diet since seeing the new Napoleon film, so I’ll wait and see for this series. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) What do you mean ? Is Napoleon shit; I haven't seen it yet? Please 🙏 don't be shit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago I haven't seen it yet, but one review said it was one of the most unintentionally funny movies of the year. Also Ridley Scott is doing a hilarious press tour for it. Scott was informed of some less than stellar French reviews of his film – French GQ called it “deeply clumsy” and “unintentionally funny” – to which Scott replied with the following solid gold banger: “The French don’t even like themselves.” But don’t think that insulting an entire country is enough for Scott. Speaking to the Sunday Times’s Jonathan Dean last weekend, he also reserved some ire for historians, some of whom have suggested that Napoleon might not be the most rigorously accurate film ever made. Scott responded by addressing the entire historian community. “Excuse me, mate, were you there?” he raged. “No? Well, shut the fuck up then.” permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago 'Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the f*** up then.’ Ridley Scott permalink fedilink source parent [–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) So your saying that its good but not historically accurate. I love history but I can enjoy historical fiction just as much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] li10@feddit.uk 1 point 2 years ago I thought it was bad tbh Didn’t like that it wasn’t historically accurate, but even looking past that it was just boring imo permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I love Goggins, this is a perfect universe for his style honestly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeBunnie@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago He was fantastic in Righteous Gemstones. Let's play Baby Billy's Bible Bonkers! permalink fedilink source parent [+] 4grams@awful.systems 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] li10@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m on a strict “don’t trust trailers” diet since seeing the new Napoleon film, so I’ll wait and see for this series. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) What do you mean ? Is Napoleon shit; I haven't seen it yet? Please 🙏 don't be shit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago I haven't seen it yet, but one review said it was one of the most unintentionally funny movies of the year. Also Ridley Scott is doing a hilarious press tour for it. Scott was informed of some less than stellar French reviews of his film – French GQ called it “deeply clumsy” and “unintentionally funny” – to which Scott replied with the following solid gold banger: “The French don’t even like themselves.” But don’t think that insulting an entire country is enough for Scott. Speaking to the Sunday Times’s Jonathan Dean last weekend, he also reserved some ire for historians, some of whom have suggested that Napoleon might not be the most rigorously accurate film ever made. Scott responded by addressing the entire historian community. “Excuse me, mate, were you there?” he raged. “No? Well, shut the fuck up then.” permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago 'Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the f*** up then.’ Ridley Scott permalink fedilink source parent [–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) So your saying that its good but not historically accurate. I love history but I can enjoy historical fiction just as much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] li10@feddit.uk 1 point 2 years ago I thought it was bad tbh Didn’t like that it wasn’t historically accurate, but even looking past that it was just boring imo permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) What do you mean ? Is Napoleon shit; I haven't seen it yet? Please 🙏 don't be shit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago I haven't seen it yet, but one review said it was one of the most unintentionally funny movies of the year. Also Ridley Scott is doing a hilarious press tour for it. Scott was informed of some less than stellar French reviews of his film – French GQ called it “deeply clumsy” and “unintentionally funny” – to which Scott replied with the following solid gold banger: “The French don’t even like themselves.” But don’t think that insulting an entire country is enough for Scott. Speaking to the Sunday Times’s Jonathan Dean last weekend, he also reserved some ire for historians, some of whom have suggested that Napoleon might not be the most rigorously accurate film ever made. Scott responded by addressing the entire historian community. “Excuse me, mate, were you there?” he raged. “No? Well, shut the fuck up then.” permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago 'Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the f*** up then.’ Ridley Scott permalink fedilink source parent [–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) So your saying that its good but not historically accurate. I love history but I can enjoy historical fiction just as much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] li10@feddit.uk 1 point 2 years ago I thought it was bad tbh Didn’t like that it wasn’t historically accurate, but even looking past that it was just boring imo permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago I haven't seen it yet, but one review said it was one of the most unintentionally funny movies of the year. Also Ridley Scott is doing a hilarious press tour for it. Scott was informed of some less than stellar French reviews of his film – French GQ called it “deeply clumsy” and “unintentionally funny” – to which Scott replied with the following solid gold banger: “The French don’t even like themselves.” But don’t think that insulting an entire country is enough for Scott. Speaking to the Sunday Times’s Jonathan Dean last weekend, he also reserved some ire for historians, some of whom have suggested that Napoleon might not be the most rigorously accurate film ever made. Scott responded by addressing the entire historian community. “Excuse me, mate, were you there?” he raged. “No? Well, shut the fuck up then.” permalink fedilink source parent
[+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago 'Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the f*** up then.’ Ridley Scott permalink fedilink source parent [–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) So your saying that its good but not historically accurate. I love history but I can enjoy historical fiction just as much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] li10@feddit.uk 1 point 2 years ago I thought it was bad tbh Didn’t like that it wasn’t historically accurate, but even looking past that it was just boring imo permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago 'Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the f*** up then.’ Ridley Scott permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Komatik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) So your saying that its good but not historically accurate. I love history but I can enjoy historical fiction just as much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] li10@feddit.uk 1 point 2 years ago I thought it was bad tbh Didn’t like that it wasn’t historically accurate, but even looking past that it was just boring imo permalink fedilink source parent [+] nico@lepoulsdumonde.com 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] li10@feddit.uk 1 point 2 years ago I thought it was bad tbh Didn’t like that it wasn’t historically accurate, but even looking past that it was just boring imo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I love Goggins, this is a perfect universe for his style honestly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeBunnie@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago He was fantastic in Righteous Gemstones. Let's play Baby Billy's Bible Bonkers! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ComradeBunnie@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago He was fantastic in Righteous Gemstones. Let's play Baby Billy's Bible Bonkers! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago They're going to find a way to release the films with bugs and release a day one patch permalink fedilink source parent