▲ 666 ▼ Court rules Gabe Newell must appear in person to testify in Steam anti-trust lawsuit (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 2 years ago by Goronmon@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world 271 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Yeah they can, they just don't have to sell on steam. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] spark947@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Steam runs weekly deals and daily sales all the time. I doubt they have to check with gog. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) This... misses the point? Of course the can not sell on Steam. That's always an option. The antitrust aspect of all of this is that Steam is the de-facto marketplace, consumers are stubborn and habitual and aren't as likely purchase games less-known platforms, and that a publisher opting not to sell on Steam might have a negative influence on the games success. If that consumer inertia gives Steam an undue advantage that wouldn't be present in a properly competitive market, then it there is an antitrust case to be made, full stop. At this point, the court will decide if the advantage is significant enough to warrant any action, so there's really no need for us to argue further. But I really don't like seeing Wolfire—which is a great pro-consumer and pro-open-source studio—having their reputation tarnished just because Lemmyites have a knee-jerk reaction to bend over and take it from Valve just because Steam is a good platform. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Can I create a shitty service that only me and my brother use, and then sue Steam cause they have more players? It's a dumb lawsuit, plain and simple permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As I said, no need for us to argue further. The lawsuit has grounds, even if you don't understand why. Read articles and legal briefs on the matter if you would like to learn more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Oh ok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spark947@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Steam runs weekly deals and daily sales all the time. I doubt they have to check with gog. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) This... misses the point? Of course the can not sell on Steam. That's always an option. The antitrust aspect of all of this is that Steam is the de-facto marketplace, consumers are stubborn and habitual and aren't as likely purchase games less-known platforms, and that a publisher opting not to sell on Steam might have a negative influence on the games success. If that consumer inertia gives Steam an undue advantage that wouldn't be present in a properly competitive market, then it there is an antitrust case to be made, full stop. At this point, the court will decide if the advantage is significant enough to warrant any action, so there's really no need for us to argue further. But I really don't like seeing Wolfire—which is a great pro-consumer and pro-open-source studio—having their reputation tarnished just because Lemmyites have a knee-jerk reaction to bend over and take it from Valve just because Steam is a good platform. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Can I create a shitty service that only me and my brother use, and then sue Steam cause they have more players? It's a dumb lawsuit, plain and simple permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As I said, no need for us to argue further. The lawsuit has grounds, even if you don't understand why. Read articles and legal briefs on the matter if you would like to learn more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Oh ok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Can I create a shitty service that only me and my brother use, and then sue Steam cause they have more players? It's a dumb lawsuit, plain and simple permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As I said, no need for us to argue further. The lawsuit has grounds, even if you don't understand why. Read articles and legal briefs on the matter if you would like to learn more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Oh ok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) As I said, no need for us to argue further. The lawsuit has grounds, even if you don't understand why. Read articles and legal briefs on the matter if you would like to learn more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Oh ok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, it doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Oh ok permalink fedilink source parent