▲ 470 ▼ European Commission rejects new laws for Stop Destroying Videogames (www.gamingonlinux.com) submitted 1 month ago by ampersandrew@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world 154 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 month ago* (1 child) A group could take SWTOR, add content, and have people donate/pay for it despite the IP holder not wanting their IP used that way. I'm guessing you blocked me, but these are mods, and they've existed for a long time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -3 points 1 month ago (1 child) No, you just don't have any good points so there isn't anything for me to engage you with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) If you don't want to engage with anything that disproves your stance, like new legislation that the civil rights movement fought for, then sure. If the "erosion of IP" is the continued availability of something that people already paid for, and the consequences of that are that now the producer is going to have a hard time selling its successor, then I think that's absolutely the obvious thing that 1.3M people signed a petition to have changed rather than relying on existing laws that clearly aren't serving the consumer. We'll see what parliament comes up with in the Digital Fairness Act and how California's efforts go. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Cool story, but no you just argue with your feelings instead of actual facts or do any research. If you did, I would consider it, but since you haven't what is the point? Even now, "we'll see what parliament comes up with". What does Parliament require for revisiting existing laws? You didn't even look that up did you? Parliament doesn't just change existing laws. That requires a new commission proposal to start a binding revision so they know what should be changed if anything. You can't just get turned down by a commission and go to parliament. You'll just get sent back to a commission. See? What is there for me to explain when you can't even be bothered to research how EU laws work? You just comment with your feelings which no one (least of all the EU Parliament) cares about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) You didn't even research the legislative changes for women's suffrage or civil rights, which you probably ought to have been taught in elementary school if you couldn't be bothered to go to Wikipedia. Actual members of European parliament seem to be confident in what they're able to achieve without a win on this citizen's initiative, going from today's press conference, and I trust that they have a better idea of it than you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -4 points 1 month ago Cool story! Anyway... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -3 points 1 month ago (1 child) No, you just don't have any good points so there isn't anything for me to engage you with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) If you don't want to engage with anything that disproves your stance, like new legislation that the civil rights movement fought for, then sure. If the "erosion of IP" is the continued availability of something that people already paid for, and the consequences of that are that now the producer is going to have a hard time selling its successor, then I think that's absolutely the obvious thing that 1.3M people signed a petition to have changed rather than relying on existing laws that clearly aren't serving the consumer. We'll see what parliament comes up with in the Digital Fairness Act and how California's efforts go. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Cool story, but no you just argue with your feelings instead of actual facts or do any research. If you did, I would consider it, but since you haven't what is the point? Even now, "we'll see what parliament comes up with". What does Parliament require for revisiting existing laws? You didn't even look that up did you? Parliament doesn't just change existing laws. That requires a new commission proposal to start a binding revision so they know what should be changed if anything. You can't just get turned down by a commission and go to parliament. You'll just get sent back to a commission. See? What is there for me to explain when you can't even be bothered to research how EU laws work? You just comment with your feelings which no one (least of all the EU Parliament) cares about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) You didn't even research the legislative changes for women's suffrage or civil rights, which you probably ought to have been taught in elementary school if you couldn't be bothered to go to Wikipedia. Actual members of European parliament seem to be confident in what they're able to achieve without a win on this citizen's initiative, going from today's press conference, and I trust that they have a better idea of it than you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -4 points 1 month ago Cool story! Anyway... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) If you don't want to engage with anything that disproves your stance, like new legislation that the civil rights movement fought for, then sure. If the "erosion of IP" is the continued availability of something that people already paid for, and the consequences of that are that now the producer is going to have a hard time selling its successor, then I think that's absolutely the obvious thing that 1.3M people signed a petition to have changed rather than relying on existing laws that clearly aren't serving the consumer. We'll see what parliament comes up with in the Digital Fairness Act and how California's efforts go. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Cool story, but no you just argue with your feelings instead of actual facts or do any research. If you did, I would consider it, but since you haven't what is the point? Even now, "we'll see what parliament comes up with". What does Parliament require for revisiting existing laws? You didn't even look that up did you? Parliament doesn't just change existing laws. That requires a new commission proposal to start a binding revision so they know what should be changed if anything. You can't just get turned down by a commission and go to parliament. You'll just get sent back to a commission. See? What is there for me to explain when you can't even be bothered to research how EU laws work? You just comment with your feelings which no one (least of all the EU Parliament) cares about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) You didn't even research the legislative changes for women's suffrage or civil rights, which you probably ought to have been taught in elementary school if you couldn't be bothered to go to Wikipedia. Actual members of European parliament seem to be confident in what they're able to achieve without a win on this citizen's initiative, going from today's press conference, and I trust that they have a better idea of it than you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -4 points 1 month ago Cool story! Anyway... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Cool story, but no you just argue with your feelings instead of actual facts or do any research. If you did, I would consider it, but since you haven't what is the point? Even now, "we'll see what parliament comes up with". What does Parliament require for revisiting existing laws? You didn't even look that up did you? Parliament doesn't just change existing laws. That requires a new commission proposal to start a binding revision so they know what should be changed if anything. You can't just get turned down by a commission and go to parliament. You'll just get sent back to a commission. See? What is there for me to explain when you can't even be bothered to research how EU laws work? You just comment with your feelings which no one (least of all the EU Parliament) cares about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) You didn't even research the legislative changes for women's suffrage or civil rights, which you probably ought to have been taught in elementary school if you couldn't be bothered to go to Wikipedia. Actual members of European parliament seem to be confident in what they're able to achieve without a win on this citizen's initiative, going from today's press conference, and I trust that they have a better idea of it than you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -4 points 1 month ago Cool story! Anyway... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) You didn't even research the legislative changes for women's suffrage or civil rights, which you probably ought to have been taught in elementary school if you couldn't be bothered to go to Wikipedia. Actual members of European parliament seem to be confident in what they're able to achieve without a win on this citizen's initiative, going from today's press conference, and I trust that they have a better idea of it than you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -4 points 1 month ago Cool story! Anyway... permalink fedilink source parent