Just proving Carney’s point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

with a small markup for the fellow poorly paid American assembly worker

You forget that the fellow poorly paid Chinese assembly worker endures even more hardship under a coerced labour regime. We must have transparent global supply chains - something China has been lobbying against for years - 'if this shit is to ever get better.'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Almost everything I thought I knew about China came from usa sources which I now question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Beware of Chinese propaganda outlets as well. Especially on Lemmy.

    Whatever big NGO will have decent information on China, as will anyone who's been there. It's openly authoritarian and aggressively nationalist, but pretty well-functioning and stability-loving within those significant constraints. And like anywhere in peacetime, a normal day is normal.

    (At least in the core Chinese areas. Obviously Xinjiang is fully in the middle of a genocide, and Tibet does have notes of the same system)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    I haven't. Us cutting the US middle man can only affect my fellow Chinese worker positively since there's more money left from the transaction without that middle man and less leverage to depress her pay, ceteris paribus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, no, your fellow Chinese worker will still suffer from forced labour under the same regime while the markup goes the corporation owner. It's just now a Chinese company owner under the control of a dictator. That's the same thing, but you criticize the one and praise the other. What a hypocrisy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    The vast majoriry of manufacturing in China has always been done by Chinese companies. Goods we buy from Walmart aren't made by Walmart factories in China, employing Chinese workers. Walmart finds the cheapest Chinese manufacturer of trays then orders their Great Value branded version, shipped straight from the factory to the Walmart distribution hub. Walmart is the middle man. We cut them. The existing employer of the Chinese worker making the trays remains unchanged. There's no hypocrisy. We're cutting the most profit-hungry middle man from the supply chain is all. We know how things work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    We know how things work.

    You are just parroting propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I'm sorry you think that, but I'm not the one with half-dozen accounts spamming China-bad all day, every day:

    Username Start End
    tardigrada@beehaw.org May 2022 Dec. 2024
    0x815@feddit.de Apr. 2023 Jun. 2024
    thelucky8@beehaw.org Apr. 2024 Jan. 2025
    0x815@feddit.org Jun. 2024 Dec. 2024
    Anyone@slrpnk.net Jan. 2025 Apr. 2025
    randomname@scribe.disroot.org Jan. 2025
    Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org Jan. 2025
    Scotty@scribe.disroot.org Aug. 2025
    Sepia@mander.xyz Nov. 2025
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Keep in mind when engaging. I've had conversations, when I still hadn't noticed that, where I'd discuss in good faith, that account would reach a pount where they don't have a good comeback, only for another account to restart the argument with slightly different framing in an attempt to reach a different conclusion. Also group up/downvoting my comments during discussions. It's crazy. I only ever engage with these accounts in case someone else reading is taking them at face value.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments