That’s right, for hardware that’s now eight years old and never got a price discount. It currently sells for C$400 – but they’re about to jack the price.

There are Android tablets that are much cheaper than the Switch, more powerful, more battery efficient. Also, play games better.

Yet, Nintendo is jacking the price.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The OP is really blowing smoke up Android's ass when it comes to the quality of native Android games. Most "top" mobile games are freemium crap riddled with microtransactions.

What it does have, however, is emulators. Including one for the Switch itself. Paying $350 for decade-old hardware and $80 for games is just bad value compared to a $300 used S21 and $0 games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    If we're going by piracy logic then you can buy a $200 used Switch and hack it to download games for free. I genuinely don't think a phone or tablet would ever be a good experience. nobody is going to play with touch controls, it doesn't let you play games on the TV, the emulator has compatibility issues and bugs, not to mention how most phones throttle hard when they get warm. I'm not buying this discussion at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Take a look at GRID Legends Mobile and tell me what on the original Switch looks better than this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItnOLA7-Er4

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh, there's no doubt about that. I'm not disagreeing that Android has some good-looking games. The problem is that games like GRID Legends Mobile are the exception, not the rule.

    The Switch is crap, yes.
    The Play Store is also overwhelmingly crap, though.

    If you exclude all of the mobile games from both stores, the Switch simply has a better catalog of games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Let's be real.

    Android's problem isn't lack of good games. Nor is it performance of hardware. It's discoverability.

    But really, that's also the problem of every storefront. Steam too has a lot of legendary games. But they're also hard to find because shitty asset flips are so abundant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No, you just suck at finding good Android games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Cyberpunk 2077 isn’t a fair comparison since the original Switch never had it. We’re comparing the original Switch to Android, not PC or PS5 to Android.

    The problem with demanding exact "equivalents" is that it feels dismissive—like you’re rejecting games without giving them a real chance. Instead of chasing direct counterparts, focus on finding great games that stand on their own merits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I’ve already mentioned several games and even shared footage of a well-known title that outperforms everything on the original Switch.

    Yet, you’re still asking for a direct 1:1 equivalent. Games are creative works—not interchangeable commodities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You’re literally making vague, empty demands and acting like I’m failing you. 😂

    Until you can actually put words to what “caliber” means—like “this game needs that feature”—your whole argument is just entitled whining dressed up as critique.

    Try again when you have a point. Until then, it’s just hot air.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’ve seen this act before—you come in dismissing everything based on vague, shifting criteria you refuse to define. Why? Because it lets you move the goalposts whenever the facts don’t fit your narrative.

    Until you actually lay out concrete criteria instead of hiding behind empty words, all you’re doing is wasting oxygen with hot air.

    Try not to trip over your own excuses next time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Yeah, I agree with you on that.

    If discoverability was better, I'm sure Android would get way more ports of good games. With the way it is right now with shovelware and Google pushing microtransaction-riddled crap over one time purchase games, though, it's treated as a second-class platform because it's not nearly as profitable as other platforms.

  • source
  • parent