▲ 66 ▼ Mainstreet polling, April 13 (lemmy.ca) submitted 1 year ago by avidamoeba@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca 22 comments fedilink hide all child comments Party Name Seats (Current) Seats Change Percentage (Current) Percentage Change Majority Probability Minority Probability Liberal 183 +23 43.6% +11% 70.5% 15.7% Conservative 138 +19 43.2% +9.5% 5.7% 8.1% Bloc 14 -18 3.5% -4.1% 0% 0% New Democrat 6 -19 6.2% -11.6% N/A N/A
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) Like what? (I'm really just curious, not challenging you or anything.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberal-oppo-csfn-1.7509217 Though is far too early for any backlash to show up in polls. EDIT a word permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca [S] 11 points 1 year ago On Friday night, in two Ottawa bars, campaign workers shared how the party was behind this move — two Liberal Party staffers attended the conference intended for conservatives and placed these buttons in areas where attendees would find them. At the pub D'Arcy McGee's near Parliament Hill, a number of Liberal war room staffers met for drinks on the far side of the bar. This journalist joined one of them for a quick conversation, but heard another staffer, who had previously identified himself as being involved in opposition research, describing how he and a colleague planted the buttons. 🤦 🤦♀️🤦♂️ But yeah, the story is from April 13th so it's unlikely to be reflected in the polls. Plus given the attitudes at the moment, I doubt people who'd vote Lib would decide not to vote Lib based on this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Thanks. I wasn't aware of that. Would that really shift the polls by that much though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Personally, I don't think it'll have a large impact, but I honestly don't know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] philbgarner@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago I believe this won't hurt as much as people assume. It might actually break through conservative users' media bubble a little bit because their algorithm is going to push this story down their throats as rage-bait but it also brings to their attention the real divide in the Conservative party currently. Something that might not have reached their eyes otherwise. It's probably a dumb mistake by overly eager staffers, but I can't shake the feeling that this is somewhat calculated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) They did a dirty trick to make the cons look worse. CBC has reported on it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) And apparently yapped about it in a pub... amateur hour. 🤡 I can just imagine PP's wailing about this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] niketunic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago check cbc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberal-oppo-csfn-1.7509217 Though is far too early for any backlash to show up in polls. EDIT a word permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca [S] 11 points 1 year ago On Friday night, in two Ottawa bars, campaign workers shared how the party was behind this move — two Liberal Party staffers attended the conference intended for conservatives and placed these buttons in areas where attendees would find them. At the pub D'Arcy McGee's near Parliament Hill, a number of Liberal war room staffers met for drinks on the far side of the bar. This journalist joined one of them for a quick conversation, but heard another staffer, who had previously identified himself as being involved in opposition research, describing how he and a colleague planted the buttons. 🤦 🤦♀️🤦♂️ But yeah, the story is from April 13th so it's unlikely to be reflected in the polls. Plus given the attitudes at the moment, I doubt people who'd vote Lib would decide not to vote Lib based on this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Thanks. I wasn't aware of that. Would that really shift the polls by that much though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Personally, I don't think it'll have a large impact, but I honestly don't know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] philbgarner@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago I believe this won't hurt as much as people assume. It might actually break through conservative users' media bubble a little bit because their algorithm is going to push this story down their throats as rage-bait but it also brings to their attention the real divide in the Conservative party currently. Something that might not have reached their eyes otherwise. It's probably a dumb mistake by overly eager staffers, but I can't shake the feeling that this is somewhat calculated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca [S] 11 points 1 year ago On Friday night, in two Ottawa bars, campaign workers shared how the party was behind this move — two Liberal Party staffers attended the conference intended for conservatives and placed these buttons in areas where attendees would find them. At the pub D'Arcy McGee's near Parliament Hill, a number of Liberal war room staffers met for drinks on the far side of the bar. This journalist joined one of them for a quick conversation, but heard another staffer, who had previously identified himself as being involved in opposition research, describing how he and a colleague planted the buttons. 🤦 🤦♀️🤦♂️ But yeah, the story is from April 13th so it's unlikely to be reflected in the polls. Plus given the attitudes at the moment, I doubt people who'd vote Lib would decide not to vote Lib based on this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Thanks. I wasn't aware of that. Would that really shift the polls by that much though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Personally, I don't think it'll have a large impact, but I honestly don't know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Personally, I don't think it'll have a large impact, but I honestly don't know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] philbgarner@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago I believe this won't hurt as much as people assume. It might actually break through conservative users' media bubble a little bit because their algorithm is going to push this story down their throats as rage-bait but it also brings to their attention the real divide in the Conservative party currently. Something that might not have reached their eyes otherwise. It's probably a dumb mistake by overly eager staffers, but I can't shake the feeling that this is somewhat calculated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) They did a dirty trick to make the cons look worse. CBC has reported on it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) And apparently yapped about it in a pub... amateur hour. 🤡 I can just imagine PP's wailing about this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) And apparently yapped about it in a pub... amateur hour. 🤡 I can just imagine PP's wailing about this. permalink fedilink source parent