108
Starfield, is it getting review bombed? (youtu.be)
submitted 2 years ago* by to c/games@lemmy.world
191 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Seems kind of like the game is just suffering from reactionaries, but I definitely don't put that much stock in critic reviews these days either.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

To me it was a disaster because I expected it to be way more next gen after all these years. And it was very expensive compared to the quality I got.
Meanwhile my friend was all like "Eh, it's fine. Pretty much what I expected."
So I think people had very different expectations.

What I absolutely cannot comprehend is those who say "10/10, game of the century!"
Come on.. No way. If you really think that, you have really low standards or haven't played a new game in 8 years.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I expected it to be way more next gen after all these years

    It is "next generation":

    • It's the next generation of huge.
    • It's also the next generation of empty.
    • It's the next generation of pretty.
    • It's also the next generation of soulless.

    I mean, it basically heightens all previous design parameters for open world games, does it not?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •