top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 99 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Fast, cheap, reliable. You can have any two you want.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    this is a server basterdization of "Good, Fast, Cheap" regarding producing just about anything I'm guessing, which tends to hold true in the real world quite well, yes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    As an engineer yeah, but honestly it’s usually pick one to prioritize, one to strive for, and one to ignore.

    We can get it out fast, and it can be not bad but pretty expensive or it can be pretty cheap but not good. If we get it good we can try to do it cheaply and take our time, or we can try to do it quickly and it’ll be expensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Well 19m players x $29 is $551,000,000 banked so far.

    They could pocket a few dozen million and still run the servers for around 85 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 43 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Don't forget the cutshare

    29 = (8.7 to Valve) (20.3 Pocket)

    7m are on Xbox, so the count is:

    Pocket = 243.6 m (on 12m copies sold)

    Valve = 104.4 m ( on 12m copies sold)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Valve reduces their cut to 20% after the first $50M in sales

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't even think to figure that in, was just doing some rough math figuring the numbers in are sure to change over the next week (methinks an upward trend for another couple weeks at least).

    What even was Pokemon? This game stomps that entire franchise imo (been playing since red&blue).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If the game ever stops, people might realize they're playing Palworld.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The thing is, I don't need to be online.

    I bet most people are playing single player.

    Apart from the people doing multiplayer 10-20%?) everyone else could just be offline.

    This is for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    But it also proves that if a company gives a shit, they can do it. This can be achieved with lower costs and experience, so in time the costs will come down.

    Whereas Activision blizzard don't give a fuck and anytime there's a new DlC or game there's significant downtime despite being a multi billion dollar company. Why people continue to support them I'll never know

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 2 years ago

    $500k/mo isn't really even all that much in cloud costs. I did some work for a large company and just the PoC/development account for our project alone was $100k/mo.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    thats a fuckton of server space, i didnt think playing on random official servers with no admins or good anti cheats would be that popular

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Or they're super inefficient.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Running a passworded Palworld server on Linux. Have about 7-10 active players on it and the server instance balloons up to ~33GB of RAM usage in less than 12 hours of uptime.

    Supposedly disabling some features (like base raids) reduces resource utilization, but was curious what stock settings would do.

    When it was restricted to 10GB on a container it would just crash every couple of hours, running out of resources.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The issue that we found is the game doesn't let go of the players when the log off and also memory leaks. I have the server reboot after taking a backup each day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    Hey my boss tells me the same and I barely make six figures wtf

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Imo they should:

    • Ask money for a subscription to go online on official servers (after they ironed out a good anti cheat)
    • Keep the self hosted / dedicated servers as a free alternative
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    500k a month to support 19 million person play base doesn't seem totally unreasonable. They've already made £400m+ in early access in the first month - so it's a drop on the ocean at the moment.

    Costs will probably come down - at the moment they've been scrambling to keep up with demand which means expensive rapid deployment rather than long term server build out.

    And presumably they plan to get the game out of early access so potentially get more players (although may not get many more players in this case as it's so popular) and more importantly start rolling out DLC content to make more money.

    I doubt they need to go the subscription route plus may be too late as they launched without it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago

    Also, the player base will be a fraction of what it is today in a month. They're dealing with unprecedented demand that's gonna fall off into something more reasonable by throwing money at it.

    It's the right thing for them to do. It would have been stupid to plan for this much demand. You'd delay the game by another year just building out a cloud native architecture. Letting the servers buckle would have killed momentum.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    presumably they plan to get the game out of early access

    I've heard that the company has a history of…not doing that. They apparently have a few games out that went early access and left in an unfinished state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    From what I can tell their games that are in early access have not been left to languish in an unfinished state and are still getting updates

    I am assuming the reason for that rumor that they just leave games unfinished has to do with people who bought their previous game Craftopia, which is very similar to Palworld but without the creatures.

    In the last 6 months it seems to have been getting constant updates and fixes (about 2 a month)based on the steam changelogs, so I am not sure how that came to be seen as the game being left to die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›