top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 100 points 3 months ago (4 children)

In some places the nice beaches have been privatised by local hotels or clubs so you gotta pay them to sit on the beach or go sit somewhere less nice. Coming from Western Australia where we have the nicest beaches in the world (all free), I take this concept of "owning beach space" as a personal affront.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 months ago

    They don't even have to be privatized. Some municipalities in the US require a "beach tag". I lived on a barrier island growing up, and we had to buy ours every year, or go to the beach two towns over where it was free (...except where it was privatized).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago*

    looking at you greece ಠ_ಠ

    but seriously.. it's hard to eek out an existence in sydney... everything is so fucking expensive.

    but peddle to the beach and read a book, it's free and the best thing in town.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 65 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    Few places nowadays is it legal to lay around & do whatever you want outdoors, usually getting cited for loitering or something.

    What kind of shitty place are you living in?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I always find it funny to figure out that stuffblike loitering isn't something the Simpson invented. It's something americans are not allowed to. But freedom is very important to them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Loitering laws are mostly just racism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The US is a shithole

    I once went to a park sat on a bench and right in front of me was a no loitering sign. It's a park, what else am I going to do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Most of those "no loitering" signs only exist to give the police a legal crowbar against homeless people. Realistically if you're just sitting and minding your business nobody will actually come along and eject you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago*

    I once went to a park sat on a bench and right in front of me was a no loitering sign. It’s a park, what else am I going to do?

    That is hilarious (well, sad actually, but you get what I mean). Also kind of reminds of that one politician once saying that "breast are not suitable for small children" in the public breastfeeding debate ...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 41 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I disagree with the initial claim.

    I can go sit just about anywhere without concern of being cited for loitering.

    Not sure where you get this idea from.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 62 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    TBF they might just not live in America. Never really seen "loitering" being a thing outside of that mistake of a country, or at least I haven't seen it enforced and I've been everywhere in Western Europe (where one would assume these things are more enforced since they're culturally closer, idk).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Yes its an american thing. I can sit where I want in my country, unless its blocking some entrance or something.

    Its because in America, you are not a human being. Someone should have informed you.

    Another thing ive seen in American movies - people are not allowed to park and sleep in their cars it seems. There is always some officer walking up and knocking on their window and telling them they cant be there. Seems to be another sign of America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    No, I'm rural in liberal territory.

    I cannot think of a single place within 20 miles in any direction that is not indoors nor private property that any human being cannot be more or less indefinitely.

    You can't camp within like 250 ft vertical of the treeline. That's off limits for protecting the environment reasons.

    If you're pulled over in a car I the side of the road, a state trooper may come to see if you're ok. Our states troopers got a much better rep than our cops, and our cops don't do too bad comparatively.

    Acab, but know your enemy. It ain't the outdoors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    TIL that "loitering" does not mean leaving garbage in public spaces. Ive heard the term but never expected it to mean standing around idle, this is so stupid.

    EDIT: nvm i was thinking about “littering”. english is hard.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You are thinking of littering. Loitering is standing around idle on another person’s property. It’s usually used now adays to move vagrants along but the law has jim crow origins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 3 months ago* (16 children)

    In Finland we have "Everyman's Right" which is the right to access nature on private land without needing the owner's permission.

    You can walk, hike, cycle, swim, pick berries/mushrooms, and camp temporarily, as long as you stay away from homes, gardens, and cultivated fields. Making a fire is however not allowed without permission.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [+] 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    In Scotland under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 you can walk, camp, and explore most land in Scotland—even if it’s private—as long as you’re respectful, don’t cause damage, and give people (especially homes and farms) their space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 25 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    Loitering is illegal in the US because public spaces are free. Why are you just sitting in a public space for free when you could be sitting in a cafe or restaurant and contributing to the economy? Oh you don't have that money? Well then you're worthless to society and just shouldn't exist, obviously.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Is this another stupid American thing? I've never heard anyone getting in trouble for just laying around on public property

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    “Loitering” aka “standing while young”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    In Canada, a very old arrangement dating from the creation of the country, says that navigable water is a federal matter. Whether it's on the side of the ocean, a big lake, or a river, the water and anything below high tide is Crown "land", and public. There are obviously exceptions and access by land can be controlled but not by water. At least not the beach itself.

    It leads to weird situations, like a provincial park that can't stop boaters from using remote parts of "their" beach. Or another where boats band together between some islands, and party and jetboat among kayaks and SUP.

    But this also prevents owners of big houses around lakes to claim a part of that lake, or the foreshore.

    We don't have the right to roam in general here, with some exceptions for Crown lands, and it happens that bodies of water and rivers is Crown land.

    Anyway, that's how I understand this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    If I am not laying on private property or in the entrance of a shop or something I can lay around whereever I want. I don't really understand what OP is talking about.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Blm land? National forest? Can lay around for 14 days straight.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (12 children)

    The land billionaires are salivating to carve up, log and develop? That land?

    EDIT: I realized that this comment seems a little to pessimistic and doomer. I didn't mean it to sound like we should just roll over and accept that these beautiful areas are taken from us and others. We absolutely need to fight back, and you'd be surprised, that even most conservatives (save for the ultra-MAGA people) actually care about this land too and are deeply against it being privatized.

    Now... Does that also say something about them caring less about POC than land, yes. But this is one of those issues you really don't have to push very hard to get people to care about. Even if they're not annual park visitors, a very large chunk of citizens in the US seem to care about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Shoutout to Daniel Burnham and Montgomery Ward for keeping Chicago's lakefront free and open for the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Except in Italy, nearly the totality of the coast is privately handled and you must pay to access it...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 6 points 3 months ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›