top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 94 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Damn i hate that word so much. What are they supposed to influence? They are advertiser, period. Influencer should be reserve for someone who actually contribute to the society, not some clown on tiktok/insta doing memes and jokes.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Worst of all is that I don't even know how to find realistic reviews for things, like smartphones, anymore - all the reviewers seem to have become "influencers" and lie to your face like "people say that this happens, but I never saw it". Bullsh!t you didn't, when it happens to basically everyone:-(. (even if the phone manufacturer sent them a souped-up item that actually works, the influencer is still collaborating with them, knowing that that will happen)

    It is easy to cure ignorance, simply with knowledge, but how do we get around misinformation now, without spending the time to become personal experts on every tiny aspect of life these days?

    Late-stage capitalism sucks skibidi toilet :-(.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You're the third person I've heard mention skibidi toilet (my 9-year-old daughter and 12-year-old niece being the other two), and I absolutely refuse to educate myself on whatever the fuck that is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Here you go: https://piped.video/watch?v=C0fQFFAml5o

    Personally I think it's dumb and absurdist enough that it loops back around to funny. Plus it's fun to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Don't do it, it's not worth it, save yourself my dude! :-P

    I hadn't heard it myself prior to like a week ago. However, now I can never go back to the blissful state of being that comes from not knowing that absolutely worthless piece of information.

    Fwiw, it is a YouTube series of videos. Beyond that... it means literally nothing, just you either have heard of it or not. I did see that it got billions of views - but how many were bots playing it to run up the subscriber stats I have no idea:-P. Also, I remember a post talking about a bunch of highly strange new young-person-jargon words having been added to the Oxford Dictionary in 2023? Which is likely not this phrase, but somehow I conflated those two thoughts and now I can't unstick them in my mind:-P.

    In this case though, I chose to use it anyway b/c the word toilet already conveys the requisite info, and the urban dictionary article about it is also funny in relation.

    Or maybe, just maybe, the success of the phrase "skibidi toilet" is in itself proof that we are all enslaved to end-stage capitalism, where algorithms feed us what we do NOT want to see or hear, and yet what they think will make them moar profitz? :-) :-(

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's so strange to hear people calling themselves an influencer, like they're bragging about their ability to psychologically manipulate people (whether to sell the shit they're being paid to pretend to like, or just for good old power tripping)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    That's why i hate that word so much. "I am/want to be an influencer" is such a weird phrase but it's an acceptable phrase for a lot of them. What do you trying to influence people with? Science? Math? Arts? Creativity? But no, it's purchasing choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I'd say you have that backwards

    Influencer is the word companies use for people with a following, and therefore power over peoples buying decisions.

    For some reason it's leaked and been misappropriated.

    If you actually make something of value you are whatever that thing is, AND a potential influencer of buying decisions.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 87 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    My impression of the main microblogging sites has been:

    Twitter: musk fanboys, celebrities and people who can't/won't switch

    Threads: conservatives, alt-right, grifters and celebrities

    Truth social: conspiracy nuts, maggots, alt-right

    Mastodon/kbin: nerds, left-wingers and furries

    Bluesky: furries, left-wingers and people who liked pre-musk Twitter

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You heard it here first, Lemmy is where the normies hang out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Lemmy: Linux fan boys who will hear no wrong. Also the gays

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Lemmy is 1000% not for normies. Not yet, anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't want to gatekeep, but I'm really enjoying Lemmy without normies. It reminds me of the pre-2k internet. Nerds and weirdos just being themselves and celebrating each other's weirdness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    But how am I supposed to improve faking not being weird (for the outside world), if we all just let out the full weirdness here? ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    It's a trap. It's all a fucking trap. Next thing you know you'll be working middle management somewhere and sipping Moscato with boring-ass friends and living vicariously through posts by people half your age on niche boards who dedicate their house to model trains or polyamory or have a ridiculous aquarium or listen to bands you've never heard of in a genre you love but now you can't listen to any more because god forbid your boss gets in your car and you autoplay something other than pop country or classic rock. Your kids'll do something and you're like "that's awesome" and you look over and your partner is frowning at you like "aren't you going to do something to stop this?"

    Just fucking be weird. Normalcy is a fucking trap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I feel like at least 70% of the tweets I get on Bluesky's Discover page are from trans people.
    I'm not complaining, it's just interesting.
    I wonder if it's an algorithm thing (I follow some trans users) or if Bluesky is simply where they all fled to after the Muskening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Completely agree. Use the nuclear option immediately to defend the fediverse from the sociopathic transnational corporation Meta.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don't say that around here. You'll get a thousand sycophants down your throat bleating "It'S ThE uSeR's ChOiCe!!!!" and that you're "against free speech" and "just as bad as Meta" if you want us to disconnect from them.

    I'm with you, though. Meta is evil and we should not be doing business with them in any way. Any user who wants to make the "choice" to do business with Meta can do it using one of Meta's many own products instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    But won't somebody please think of those poor billionaires who want us to buy those things that they pay influencers to sell on Threads!? /s

    Ironically one of the top things I cherish in life is not having to watch such ads, which is why I am not on Threads/Facebook/Meta/Twitter/X or even Reddit (except one sub that won't move here) in the first place.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think social media was invented to cause revolutions

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Idk, man. If you look at countries currently experiencing lots of public uprisings and revolutionary organizing, they seem to be the ones with some of the least prolific digital media. Myanmar, northern India, and rural Bolivia all have terrible wifi.

    Folks in "modern" nations like South Korea and Dubai and the UK are increasingly these NEET hermits with no friends or romantic partners or sense of collective good will who just fixate on online phantasm celebrities. Occasionally, one of them pops off and tries to murder a politician. But that's not revolutionary conduct.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Seems like it's easier to divide people who arr using social media.

    If they don't have social media, they might go make friends, and those friends might have the same problems, and might seek to solve them...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Won't it be more fun to downvote anything posted or connected by a user @threads?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›