I dunno, those slime monsters might love the lettuce in the USA right about now... all that "extra seasoning", yum!? ππ€€
Fair, I guess that was more my own take-away from it than summary! :-P
Mayhaps, forsooth.
Oh.
The Internet itself surely will continue, but yes the "free and open" version is already gone (how to test this: attempt to self-host a website now, like a Lemmy instance, and see how long until AI scrapers bring it to its knees).
Wonderful!
Still not going to make a TikTok account though:-P.
Mostly those on "the list"π
To add to what others are saying, your instance does not support Tesseract anyway, though if you read your instance sidebar text it points to Photon & Alexandrite frontends as options if you wanted to change the way that Lemmy looks to you (and if you use a browser rather than 3rd-party app).
The question is already answered, but if you are curious your instance sidebar says that the alternative front-ends that are available to you on it are: Photon, Alexandrite, Old (as in looks like old-Reddit), and Blorp. Tesseract is not one of them.
How dare you mention this!
...
without adding how Tesseract also dislikes no pooping!
(Tbf I also dislike no pooping.)
spoiler
Made you look! π
Though I do hear that Tesseract is very much a fan of corn.
Right, but what you can't do is visit this place for the very first time, and without knowing what you do now, see it without all the toxicity.
Whether we agree or not that he was aiming at a good goal - though fwiw I do believe that it is a laudable one, helping make the Threadiverse more palatable to mainstream normies who could in turn bring new content here - the point remains that he was aiming at something. And nobody is forced into using it.
Except that by virtue of the disclosure not being very transparent, people might actually have used it without knowing. So the CONTENT of the existence of a toxicity filter is not so bad imho (obvious issues notwithstanding, like who decides who is "toxic" or not), it rather was the PROCESS of how it was done, and moreover how it was (not) explained to people that makes it so aggravating.
At least that's my 2Β’. Fortunately, you are allowed to disagree:-).
Also, to be clear I'm talking about the second list, the one with the usernames. That one can easily be turned off. Arguably it would be better to ship the software with it off by default, making the feature opt-in rather than opt-out, but that's not what Tesseract is all about, by design.
At which point people who disagree can simply not use it, problem solved.

