[–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

If you just vibe AI, it will lull you into thinking you're doing great.

  1. Define what successful AI usage looks like and include metrics and measurements — include AI usage in your story/ticketing system.
  2. Define parameters for usage. Will it write documentation? Write tests? Write functions? Classes? Whole features? Will it review code? How are you making sure everyone understands the new code (i.e. you don't want devs committing code they don't understand or reviewers passing it)
  3. How will you reign in costs? I had 3 devs spend over $1500 (each) in thirty days and am in the process of a explaining this to my COO. Purchasing plans instead of using API keys gives you some natural boundaries for reigning in costs.
  4. Create standard processes. Don't vibe. Have a standard for how your AI-facing documentation is structured. Have standards/templates for how prompts are structured. Have standard prompts with limited scope for specific tasks. For example have a prompt just for review that specifies to review from the standpoint of security and best practices.
  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's super aggravating. Lemmy is pretty much my only social outlet. I've had to go back to Discord.

    But hey, it's free/no ads. I'll probably soon be in a position (after several months out of work) to donate, but until I do I guess I can't exactly complain.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    My whole feed has been hosed for a couple of weeks. I'm seeing zero posts in about half my subbed communities and scant few posts even in the ones that do get them. I'm also not seeing all the comments or votes. I assume this is being worked on, but Lemmy might as well be dead for me. I can go 9 hours without a new post anywhere.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    It would be great to implement client side. I just don't know how the comment system would work. Do you post to 4 communities all at once? Obviously moderation issues if it's a single comment linked to 4 servers, but if it's not then people who don't have a client that combines duplicate comments on duplicate communities would see a bunch of garbage spam.

    I guess I'm not saying it's inconceivable that this feature could be done well, but the obstacles seem really tall. I can't even imagine how I would implement this.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    I understand why some folks would want this, but I just don't. I don't want to interact with users from e.g. .ml so I don't go to communities hosted on that instance. But if they were joined in, you'd get the same people in News and Politics regardless of where you go.

    I would pretty much be forced to find or run an instance that federates with exactly the right servers. Even then, I'll have someone talking about what u/shitfart said in their comment and I won't have a fucking clue what they're talking about. Then there are the people caught in between who see everything and wonder why people are talking like they don't see one another.

    It would just be an absolute shit show. My instance is having some federation problems right now and I'll see someone say "I'm jumping on the bandwagon" but there is literally no one else [that I can see] who is taking about what they just said.

    I totally get why this would seem to be a good idea, but I don't like it.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I just checked my blocked instances. zerobytes.monster is the only one I know for sure. Couple of others I'm not sure why I blocked. Most of them are to filter out languages I don't read from the All view. Possibly lemmit.online.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›