"Sweden, Canada, and the Netherlands have confirmed deployments as part of the same multinational operation" according to Newsweek, citing "multiple outlets." I'm pretty sure I heard about it on CBC radio news.

I don't know, but it would be pretty strange for Canada to be left out.

Im not against helping if we can but we are mostly the next in line for that demented ghoul empire dream so preparing here could be a good idea for our troops

Operation Arctic Endurance - military exercise in Greenland organized by Denmark. From what I can find online, which is very little, Denmark sent invitations to other countries to participate. We don't know if Canada was invited. What we do know from the article:

Canada’s Foreign Minister Anita Anand is set to open an official consulate in Nuuk, Greenland’s capital, in the coming weeks, and has expressed support for the island’s sovereignty in recent public statements and bilateral meetings.

Other countries know where we stand. Let's wait and see if we get invited.

I thought we were invited. To me, this is a Carney L for Canada until demonstrated otherwise (edit: sorry, I realized I'm talking in sports clichés: an L is a loss, like a W is a win)

Eat shit Carney. At least Trudeau had the guts to publically say that there won't be a snowball's chance in hell of Canada being the 51st state.

we need a troops here to defend against American Invasion

It doesn't really make sense to. The idea of a sending a token force is to act as trip-wire. A trip-wire force is there so if they're attacked, it means war. In that case, those soldiers would be reinforced. They're the tip of the spear.

If Canada sent a trip-wire force in Greenland, those soldiers would not be be expecting reinforcements if attacked by the US. Because Canada is on the border with the US there would be fighting much closer to the aggressor than where the trip-wire forces are. So it would be sending soldiers to Greenland and telling them if attacked by the US they will die with no hope of reinforcement.

You put trip-wires on your outer defenses between you and your enemy. You don't put them far away from the front-lines of a potential conflict. Doing that is just telling soldiers to either die or surrender if attacked.

Remember they're soldiers not some pawns on a chessboard that you sacrifice for a phony political statement. Really what would be the plan to reinforce Canadian soldiers sent to Greenland if they were attacked by US forces?

Science has yet to uncover what it is about Trump that makes liberal politicians so weak in the knees.

What a disgrace for Canada. Once again, my country makes me feel ashamed.

The Carney government had been good on diversifying economically, but not so much on security. Also, Carney backed Trump's plan for Gaza, and essentially backed the actions taken in Venezuela. Carney wrote an article in the economist a couple of months ago that basically said goodbye to universal multilateral institutions, which are the foundation of having international law. I don't know what to expect from Carney on continental security vs NATO violations, but he has certainly not drawn a clear line in the sand against US imperialism.