Edit: this is meant to be a shitpost. I don't care about your favorite series/universe. You do you.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 51 points 7 months ago (2 children)

With exception of the scifi label and being well known they are not even comparable.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

    Star Wars is an action/adventure/drama series that happens to be in space (they called it “space opera” for good reason).

    Star Trek is a science fiction series, at least until Fuller/Kurtzman (where it strayed more to action/adventure). You kind of have to bisect Star Trek into pre and post Roddenberry/Berman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I think the best label for Star Wars is probably “Science Fantasy”. Personally, when it comes to this sort of differentiation, I draw the line at: is there magic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Q is more "magical" than anything in Star Wars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    even in Trek, it's openly acknowledged that there must be a scientific explanation for Q, even if it's beyond humanity's current understanding. they also mention several times that any sufficiently advanced technology would appear to be magic to those who lack the ability to rationally explain it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Yeah, Star Wars is a fantasy that is set in space.

    There are aspects of Sci-Fi but the galaxy often blurs the line between magic and technology.

    It has space opera elements, but Star Wars anymore is a setting rather than a story.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 34 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Wait until you hear about stargate.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    Babylon 5 wants a word out back. And Farscape is waiting to surprise them both

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I think it's a dumb debate personally.

    I love my space exploration show. I also love my space wizard drama, and my space politics show, and my wibbly wobbly spacey wacey show. I just like goofy shows in space.

    Except Picard. I don't care for Picard.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 14 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    Eh, they both have their place. I can't get behind Jedi being emotionally stunted or the federation not using it's tech to the fullest.

    My one exception is pre-Disney Mandolorians. Nothing is sexier than freefalling from orbit on the back of a 6 legged robot dragon with nothing but your platemail and a vague goal of scaring the shit out of locals.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    My one exception is pre-Disney Mandolorians. Nothing is sexier than freefalling from orbit on the back of a 6 legged robot dragon with nothing but your platemail and a vague goal of scaring the shit out of locals.

    My knowledge of Star Wars is almost entirely pre-Disney, but I am completely lost here. What is that describing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    🌎🧑‍🚀🔫👩‍🚀

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    Star Trek is one of if not the most prominent Science Fiction series in our culture.

    Star Wars is one of if not the most prominent "Science" based Fantasy series in our culture.

    They really aren't at all similar on the most fundamental level. They just use similar set dressing.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Post TNG and Voyager, they've been fairly blah with a handful of decent standout episodes.

    Maybe it's because I grew up with these shows, and now I'm old I just want something with a bit more heft.

    It's just all seems like light entertainment these days. Something akin to The Expanse is what I'm after.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    The only real comparison I can draw between the two is both have disappointed me by moving away from their established brands and disappointing me.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    What happens when a stormtrooper shoots at an unnamed redshirt?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Storm trooper still misses, but red shirt dies of heart attack. Or they dodge, slip on a replicated banana and hit their head on the Conn and die, while sending the enterprise on a spin near a black hole. Now Chewbacca has to charm nurse Chappel or the Kryptonians will take advantage and board the ship.

    Take that AI, this is human made slop. You're not better than me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    Idk, Star Wars and Star Trek only share the sense that they’re both in space, overall both very different and we like both. Personally we like Star Wars more because autism brain but yeah start trek is good too :3

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    Hot take: Babylon 5 is right at the top there with Star Trek.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    I'm not so sure. If we're counting everything that carries the Star Trek logo as a whole, then currently Star Trek is incredibly shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Depends on which star trek and which star wars

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    If you want to compare current stuff, then both are trash. sequel trilogy at least had the decency of being entertaining garbage while disco was 10% plot and 90% people talking about the 10% in case you missed anything while looking at tiktok.

    original trilogy and next generation are both good shit, and are good for different reasons.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Back in the day, episode 2 made me realize I didn't like Star Wars that much, I just really loved Empire.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Original trilogy + EU books/comics/games is peak star wars for me. Rogue squadron, young Jedi academy, thrawn trilogy, etc. Star trek I think delivers more consistently across series but if I had to pick a peak maybe end of tng beginning of ds9/voyager.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    I prefer the shitpost genre. We live in the Bronze Age of shitposting, can't wait for what comes next.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    I feel like doctor who is more of a comparison to Star Trek no.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›