Edit: this is meant to be a shitpost. I don't care about your favorite series/universe. You do you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Eh, they both have their place. I can't get behind Jedi being emotionally stunted or the federation not using it's tech to the fullest.

My one exception is pre-Disney Mandolorians. Nothing is sexier than freefalling from orbit on the back of a 6 legged robot dragon with nothing but your platemail and a vague goal of scaring the shit out of locals.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    My one exception is pre-Disney Mandolorians. Nothing is sexier than freefalling from orbit on the back of a 6 legged robot dragon with nothing but your platemail and a vague goal of scaring the shit out of locals.

    My knowledge of Star Wars is almost entirely pre-Disney, but I am completely lost here. What is that describing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    the federation not using it's tech to the fullest.

    Funny you say that, since the Federation arguably doesn't.

    Just look at warp drives, for example. A galaxy-class can go from reverse to full forward in a third of a millisecond. Smaller, newer ships like the Intrepid, of the Sovereign, would be both faster and even more agile.

    Federation starships should be zooming about the battlefield like dragonflies instead of slowly flying around each other like star wars ships. Though it makes some sense why they won't, since the viewers would have a fit about it being unrealistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    My biggest grievance is that the threat of death exists when, between replicators and transporter errors, they could populate their ships with unending clone armies to explore without ever risking anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Not having clone armies at least makes sense, since the Federation isn't exactly that fond of cloning sapients, inorganics aside. Too many ethical issues involved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Ok, so instead of staffing a ship with 1000 duplicates of one guy who volunteers to go out and risk his life, they could add some extra storage to the transport buffer and require weekly backups of all crew. Then if redshirt #3 dies planet side they just spin him back up and tell him what went wrong. They have video game style save points on every ship and they're using them to save on gas.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    You'd enjoy the opening to Starship Troopers.

    The rest of the book is neonationalist garbage but the openinging sequence is good. And the likely inspiration for the drop you described.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The rest of the book is neonationalist garbage

    Just have to ask...you do realize it's satire, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The book? Or the movie?

    The book is 100% serious. It's fucking ridiculous. But Heinlein is pretty sincere and uses it as his philosophical treatise. There's more than one section where he sits everyone down in a classroom for a lecture.

    The movie is satire. It takes the themes presented and makes sure that everyone who espouses the virtues of the militant fascist state is horribly disfigured.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I have a hard time getting a read on Heinlein because he also wrote Stranger in a Strange Land which is as left as Starship Troopers is right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    As I understand he wrote SiaSL to be deliberately provocative. It read to me as if he was just dreaming up the most bizarrely counter culture things he could think of and mushing them together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    Stranger was considerably more thoughtful and deliberate than you've described, but even still how is that different than Starship Troopers? Heinlein used his novels to explore worldviews, not really to endorse them. If you start trying to pin down his sincere beliefs with any one book, you're pretty quickly going to run into inconsistencies with the others.

  • source
  • parent