Reference (passed peer review btw):

Muhammad Salman Hameed, Hongxuan Cao, Li Guo, Lei Zeng, Yanliang Ren, Advancements, challenges, and future frontiers in covalent inhibitors and covalent drugs: A review, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports, Volume 12, 2024, 100217, ISSN 2772-4174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.100217

Try this link if the above doesn't work (not that it's worth visiting in the first place...): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277241742400089X?via=ihub

all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 83 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That image was generated by AI and edited over. They didn't even bother correcting all of it or erasing the parts that didn't make sense.

Ffs, this is blatant.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    How in the fuck did this pass peer review?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago

    Not even peer review, the problem doesn't go far enough to reach the level of checking the scientific methodology. Did nobody even read the article before publishing? They don't have editors in the journal this was published in?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    what peer review? This is likely one of the many reviewless journals that solely exist to publish, for a generous fee, shit that wouldn't even pass as an undergrad homework. people then can write in their CVs for grant applications or position applications in low tier universities etc The name of the journal is usually chosen to look fancy and very international so it looks good on your CV. Honestly there are so many such journals now, no one person would be able to tell which is which, it's a complete mess. Humans find a way of fucking up everything for profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Dang, is always the small cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago

    Non-small lung cancer: 🚙

    Seems legit.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wonder if they tested this on ridiculously well-endowed rats.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Everything reminds me of HER2.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    "I have lung cancer? How bad is it?"
    "Well let's just say it's...non-small lung cancer."

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Actually that part is a legitimate classification and not part of the AI nonsense. Broadly, lung cancers are classified as either "small cell" cancers or "non small cell" cancers based on how the tumor appears microscopically. The "non small cell" cancers can be further subdivided into various types.

    The reason for this distinction between the two is due to the significant difference in clinical management and prognosis. Having "small cell" lung cancer is effectively a death sentence, whereas the other types are a lot more treatable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    What's up with this AI generated garbage? This post isn't even half a day old and the article is already down.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Its still there but the links goed trough like 3 proxys and sometimes fails.

    Also new theory: auto generate ai slop on official platforms like science research to auto share those on social media as rage bait to then auto sell the “active” account in the furure.

    It doesn’t need to be economically feasibly to be sure some people are trying something like it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    NOOO GO AWAY, BIND/TORTURE/KILL KILLER DO NOT GIVE ME CANCER

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Turn around, bright eyes.

    EGFR and AFATINIB

    And I need you now tonight.

    And I need you more than ever.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    They're living up to the chinese stereotype unfortunately

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    text looks sus too

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Doi seems to be a dead link now?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments