top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm switching to Linux before I ever touch win11

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Just got a W11 laptop new from work, (replacing a dead W10 machine). It is such a mess. It is trying hard to be a modern desktop like KDE Plasma or GNOME, but without a cohesive setup. And bluescreened twice already, had a WebApp failure error, and locked up completely another time at login. This is brand-new Out of the Box.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Hmmm. I don't really like Windows myself and haven't setup a machine without for me in one a decade. But neither my work "development" laptop (in quotation marks because I'm not a developer) nor a mini PC I installed for my dad ever had bluescreens. They can still happen, of course... but it almost seems to require effort with really bad drivers or broken hardware.

    The obvious Windows issues nowadays are a different category from 20 years ago in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I don’t think that the people still on windows 10 are in a hurry to upgrade. I suspect that either they don’t want to or are not aware of the risk of outdated security updates. So in the end it probably will come down to whether those people need an actual hardware upgrade or not.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    local AI is cool and all, but neither the hardware nor the models are really ready for your average consumer

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Who actually uses "local AI" beyond developers and a handful of end users? These NPUs are wasted silicon - akin to sticking a gaming GPU in your CPU that only works for games that are either in development or 99% of people don't give a shit about

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    The only real advantage of local AI is privacy and that it's much cheaper if you use it a lot.

    The only consumer use case I see in the wild with some real momentum behind it is role play.

    All the local AI communities I browse are 50% people trying to find usecases for it at their job (like me; unsuccessfully I might add) and 50% people interested in role play.

    People will apparently spend thousands to jerk off to a soulless machine demon simulacrum shell of a human.

    To be fair, I can see the appeal of local AI for video games, like RPGs. There is this really fun game called "Suck Up", where you are a vampire trying to convince AI to let you inside their house. That is the one real "killer" application I see atm.

    I personally see a lot of other useful usecases for local AI, but from my experience at work, I would estimste it will take another 5 years until any of it is anywhere near consumer ready.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    AI is being driven by LLMs hosted on the cloud, so why would anyone in their right mind buy a Laptop with "AI" "inside" it?

    Even the most technophobic consumer understands this - you can Google something today with a PC from 2014 and it'll spit out AI slop for you to slurp on. AI chatbots are embedded into every website you can think of -- you already have AI shit in your device, it's just being outsourced to data centers.

    AI accelerators should've always been an add-on card like GPUs, or at least embedded into GPUs (like some are) but this whole embedded-into-every-chip-imaginable AI bollocks is a waste of silicon and largely a marketing gimmick to uplift CPU prices.

    CPU vendors are struggling to keep justifying new generations and they're getting desperate. For 90% of people (conservative guess) a CPU needs no more raw processing power than something from 2010-2014 and 4-6 cores; The kicker is, that this requirement hasn't been touched for years - the host OS has just artificially bloated itself to push sales.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah my gaming pc is from 2014 and runs modern shit fine. Well did, my GPU seems to have packed it in over the weekend. So I'm on the verge of buying a entire new machine. Ten years is pretty good

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Every person I know either already has a Windows 11 ready device, or doesn't know what an OS is. In the later case, I doubt they would trust themselves to buy a new laptop, rightfully tho. Luckily we have a bunch of old laptops from work, Win 11 compatible. Nobody will buy a new Laptop in my village!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    And for those tech-savvy, or with tech-savvy family members, you can put Win11 on basically any PC. It may run like shit, but all the requirements can be disabled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It depends. Microsoft has recently enabled compilation options for their binaries that will make them incompatible with older CPUs: https://www.guru3d.com/story/windows-11-24h2-new-cpu-instruction-requirements-impact-compatibility-on-older-hardware/

    Granted, these are quite old nowadays, but they could enforce newer instructions as well, like AVX-512.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    "update to win 11"? Welp, guess my next PC is a Steamdeck.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Anyone who is just starting out with Linux and doesn't want to put in a lot of effort should definitely choose Mint over Arch. If you really want to learn the ins and outs, Arch is great. If you just want a usable computer, Mint is your daddy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You can't seriously be suggesting Arch for new Linux users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I wasn’t really. Read the rest of the comments.

    But on another note i went straight from windows to Arch as a complete linux noob and never looked back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I did the same with Endeavour and ended up on fedora. I can monitor and merge pacnew files….. but why the hell should I when fedora runs like a champ with software almost as fresh off the presses as arch and basically zero maintenance.

    An arch based system was an excellent learning tool but it isn’t viable for the majority of users.

    This concludes my sectarian rant. Btw.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do you use Fedora Workstation or Silverblue? Is the KDE version fine to use? I'm pretty tempted to switch, I just want a reasonably up to date system that doesn't get in my way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I run workstation with Gnome. KDE is fine, and fedora implements it in vanilla fashion without any tweaks, which is good. I personally stopped using KDE because it doesn’t always work the way I want it to, and Gnome does. Games can easily be swapped between monitors if it opens on the wrong one initially. Gnome took some getting used to but it’s fantastic. Give it a shot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm really happy with KDE, I love how customizable it is and I also mostly prefer KDE software. Gnome is cool, but it's not for me.

    But I'll give Fedora Workstation a shot, thanks!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Use fedora KDE then, they are working on making it the same status as fedora workstation.

    You will not lose out on anything by using the KDE iso. Well except gnome and gnome related packages, of which you can install any one of if you want them later

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Just my two cents I could only get my Ryzen 5 5600X and RTX 3080 to run games reliability on EndeavourOS. Tried PopOS, Kubuntu and Fedora KDE spin and all those had issues after a while or failed to run games out of the box and following wikis/guides

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Believe it or not, when I had my old 2060 laptop I used EndeavourOS for the same reason. But now I’m on a full AMD system, and the quirks of nvidia are no longer an issue for me. So yeah, good two cents. Everyone’s Linux journey involves some trial and error and finding what works for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    the expected increase in prices next year is hastening that timeline in the u.s.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Need" to upgrade?

    need is a strong word, lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›