▲ 111 ▼ AI PCs aren't driving sales — The need to upgrade from Windows 10 will drive 2025 laptop sales (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 2 years ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca 65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 years ago* (3 children) -> Exit here permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] odium@programming.dev 27 points 2 years ago (4 children) better option for most ppl permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) Anyone who is just starting out with Linux and doesn't want to put in a lot of effort should definitely choose Mint over Arch. If you really want to learn the ins and outs, Arch is great. If you just want a usable computer, Mint is your daddy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Anyone who suggests Arch as the starter Linux distro is absolutely delusional and has probably never spoken to or interacted with the average person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago They're the kind of people who write "Git gud, n00b!" in Linux forums. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 9 points 2 years ago I also won't recommend someone to use Arch as their first Distros. You will not have a great time. You need to learn how to use the terminal first. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) For those that are interested in Arch (btw), but don't want to install manually. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* I use Antergos myself but second this easier install method! Edit meant EndeavourOS permalink fedilink source parent [–] MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even Ubuntu is fine as a gateway drug. Or Pop Os! Don’t be afraid to recommend easy solutions to Linux beginners who otherwise might not be interested in learning the internals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* i have zero issues with ubuntu and have distrohopped alot permalink fedilink source parent [–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Thats fair, i also did it for the memes. On Lemmy it does feel like preaching to the choir but thats no excuse to not have included both. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can't seriously be suggesting Arch for new Linux users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I wasn’t really. Read the rest of the comments. But on another note i went straight from windows to Arch as a complete linux noob and never looked back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) I did the same with Endeavour and ended up on fedora. I can monitor and merge pacnew files….. but why the hell should I when fedora runs like a champ with software almost as fresh off the presses as arch and basically zero maintenance. An arch based system was an excellent learning tool but it isn’t viable for the majority of users. This concludes my sectarian rant. Btw. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you use Fedora Workstation or Silverblue? Is the KDE version fine to use? I'm pretty tempted to switch, I just want a reasonably up to date system that doesn't get in my way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I run workstation with Gnome. KDE is fine, and fedora implements it in vanilla fashion without any tweaks, which is good. I personally stopped using KDE because it doesn’t always work the way I want it to, and Gnome does. Games can easily be swapped between monitors if it opens on the wrong one initially. Gnome took some getting used to but it’s fantastic. Give it a shot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm really happy with KDE, I love how customizable it is and I also mostly prefer KDE software. Gnome is cool, but it's not for me. But I'll give Fedora Workstation a shot, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Use fedora KDE then, they are working on making it the same status as fedora workstation. You will not lose out on anything by using the KDE iso. Well except gnome and gnome related packages, of which you can install any one of if you want them later permalink fedilink source parent [–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Just my two cents I could only get my Ryzen 5 5600X and RTX 3080 to run games reliability on EndeavourOS. Tried PopOS, Kubuntu and Fedora KDE spin and all those had issues after a while or failed to run games out of the box and following wikis/guides permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Believe it or not, when I had my old 2060 laptop I used EndeavourOS for the same reason. But now I’m on a full AMD system, and the quirks of nvidia are no longer an issue for me. So yeah, good two cents. Everyone’s Linux journey involves some trial and error and finding what works for you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) why not ubuntu? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Debian > Ubuntu. Less extra stuff shoveled in and while not bleeding edge it's not a dinosaur. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) yes, i like debian as well. just havent used in a few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It keeps getting better. Better HW support, newer packages, no Canonical corporate crap. I run it on my gaming machine, work laptop, server, nas, and a 2013 netbook. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago Yes i know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago lol no. Canonical has left a bad taste in my mouth far too many times. Snaps are generally awful, collecting analytics without user knowledge at one point. If I was going to use something Ubuntu based it would be mint, but I prefer a native vanilla gnome experience. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 2 years ago* second serious option for most people permalink fedilink source parent
[–] odium@programming.dev 27 points 2 years ago (4 children) better option for most ppl permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) Anyone who is just starting out with Linux and doesn't want to put in a lot of effort should definitely choose Mint over Arch. If you really want to learn the ins and outs, Arch is great. If you just want a usable computer, Mint is your daddy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Anyone who suggests Arch as the starter Linux distro is absolutely delusional and has probably never spoken to or interacted with the average person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago They're the kind of people who write "Git gud, n00b!" in Linux forums. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 9 points 2 years ago I also won't recommend someone to use Arch as their first Distros. You will not have a great time. You need to learn how to use the terminal first. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) For those that are interested in Arch (btw), but don't want to install manually. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* I use Antergos myself but second this easier install method! Edit meant EndeavourOS permalink fedilink source parent [–] MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even Ubuntu is fine as a gateway drug. Or Pop Os! Don’t be afraid to recommend easy solutions to Linux beginners who otherwise might not be interested in learning the internals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* i have zero issues with ubuntu and have distrohopped alot permalink fedilink source parent [–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Thats fair, i also did it for the memes. On Lemmy it does feel like preaching to the choir but thats no excuse to not have included both. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) Anyone who is just starting out with Linux and doesn't want to put in a lot of effort should definitely choose Mint over Arch. If you really want to learn the ins and outs, Arch is great. If you just want a usable computer, Mint is your daddy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Anyone who suggests Arch as the starter Linux distro is absolutely delusional and has probably never spoken to or interacted with the average person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago They're the kind of people who write "Git gud, n00b!" in Linux forums. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 9 points 2 years ago I also won't recommend someone to use Arch as their first Distros. You will not have a great time. You need to learn how to use the terminal first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Anyone who suggests Arch as the starter Linux distro is absolutely delusional and has probably never spoken to or interacted with the average person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago They're the kind of people who write "Git gud, n00b!" in Linux forums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago They're the kind of people who write "Git gud, n00b!" in Linux forums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 9 points 2 years ago I also won't recommend someone to use Arch as their first Distros. You will not have a great time. You need to learn how to use the terminal first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) For those that are interested in Arch (btw), but don't want to install manually. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* I use Antergos myself but second this easier install method! Edit meant EndeavourOS permalink fedilink source parent
[–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* I use Antergos myself but second this easier install method! Edit meant EndeavourOS permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even Ubuntu is fine as a gateway drug. Or Pop Os! Don’t be afraid to recommend easy solutions to Linux beginners who otherwise might not be interested in learning the internals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* i have zero issues with ubuntu and have distrohopped alot permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* i have zero issues with ubuntu and have distrohopped alot permalink fedilink source parent
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Thats fair, i also did it for the memes. On Lemmy it does feel like preaching to the choir but thats no excuse to not have included both. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can't seriously be suggesting Arch for new Linux users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I wasn’t really. Read the rest of the comments. But on another note i went straight from windows to Arch as a complete linux noob and never looked back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) I did the same with Endeavour and ended up on fedora. I can monitor and merge pacnew files….. but why the hell should I when fedora runs like a champ with software almost as fresh off the presses as arch and basically zero maintenance. An arch based system was an excellent learning tool but it isn’t viable for the majority of users. This concludes my sectarian rant. Btw. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you use Fedora Workstation or Silverblue? Is the KDE version fine to use? I'm pretty tempted to switch, I just want a reasonably up to date system that doesn't get in my way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I run workstation with Gnome. KDE is fine, and fedora implements it in vanilla fashion without any tweaks, which is good. I personally stopped using KDE because it doesn’t always work the way I want it to, and Gnome does. Games can easily be swapped between monitors if it opens on the wrong one initially. Gnome took some getting used to but it’s fantastic. Give it a shot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm really happy with KDE, I love how customizable it is and I also mostly prefer KDE software. Gnome is cool, but it's not for me. But I'll give Fedora Workstation a shot, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Use fedora KDE then, they are working on making it the same status as fedora workstation. You will not lose out on anything by using the KDE iso. Well except gnome and gnome related packages, of which you can install any one of if you want them later permalink fedilink source parent [–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Just my two cents I could only get my Ryzen 5 5600X and RTX 3080 to run games reliability on EndeavourOS. Tried PopOS, Kubuntu and Fedora KDE spin and all those had issues after a while or failed to run games out of the box and following wikis/guides permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Believe it or not, when I had my old 2060 laptop I used EndeavourOS for the same reason. But now I’m on a full AMD system, and the quirks of nvidia are no longer an issue for me. So yeah, good two cents. Everyone’s Linux journey involves some trial and error and finding what works for you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) why not ubuntu? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Debian > Ubuntu. Less extra stuff shoveled in and while not bleeding edge it's not a dinosaur. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) yes, i like debian as well. just havent used in a few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It keeps getting better. Better HW support, newer packages, no Canonical corporate crap. I run it on my gaming machine, work laptop, server, nas, and a 2013 netbook. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago Yes i know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago lol no. Canonical has left a bad taste in my mouth far too many times. Snaps are generally awful, collecting analytics without user knowledge at one point. If I was going to use something Ubuntu based it would be mint, but I prefer a native vanilla gnome experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I wasn’t really. Read the rest of the comments. But on another note i went straight from windows to Arch as a complete linux noob and never looked back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) I did the same with Endeavour and ended up on fedora. I can monitor and merge pacnew files….. but why the hell should I when fedora runs like a champ with software almost as fresh off the presses as arch and basically zero maintenance. An arch based system was an excellent learning tool but it isn’t viable for the majority of users. This concludes my sectarian rant. Btw. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you use Fedora Workstation or Silverblue? Is the KDE version fine to use? I'm pretty tempted to switch, I just want a reasonably up to date system that doesn't get in my way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I run workstation with Gnome. KDE is fine, and fedora implements it in vanilla fashion without any tweaks, which is good. I personally stopped using KDE because it doesn’t always work the way I want it to, and Gnome does. Games can easily be swapped between monitors if it opens on the wrong one initially. Gnome took some getting used to but it’s fantastic. Give it a shot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm really happy with KDE, I love how customizable it is and I also mostly prefer KDE software. Gnome is cool, but it's not for me. But I'll give Fedora Workstation a shot, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Use fedora KDE then, they are working on making it the same status as fedora workstation. You will not lose out on anything by using the KDE iso. Well except gnome and gnome related packages, of which you can install any one of if you want them later permalink fedilink source parent [–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Just my two cents I could only get my Ryzen 5 5600X and RTX 3080 to run games reliability on EndeavourOS. Tried PopOS, Kubuntu and Fedora KDE spin and all those had issues after a while or failed to run games out of the box and following wikis/guides permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Believe it or not, when I had my old 2060 laptop I used EndeavourOS for the same reason. But now I’m on a full AMD system, and the quirks of nvidia are no longer an issue for me. So yeah, good two cents. Everyone’s Linux journey involves some trial and error and finding what works for you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) why not ubuntu? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Debian > Ubuntu. Less extra stuff shoveled in and while not bleeding edge it's not a dinosaur. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) yes, i like debian as well. just havent used in a few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It keeps getting better. Better HW support, newer packages, no Canonical corporate crap. I run it on my gaming machine, work laptop, server, nas, and a 2013 netbook. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago Yes i know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago lol no. Canonical has left a bad taste in my mouth far too many times. Snaps are generally awful, collecting analytics without user knowledge at one point. If I was going to use something Ubuntu based it would be mint, but I prefer a native vanilla gnome experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) I did the same with Endeavour and ended up on fedora. I can monitor and merge pacnew files….. but why the hell should I when fedora runs like a champ with software almost as fresh off the presses as arch and basically zero maintenance. An arch based system was an excellent learning tool but it isn’t viable for the majority of users. This concludes my sectarian rant. Btw. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you use Fedora Workstation or Silverblue? Is the KDE version fine to use? I'm pretty tempted to switch, I just want a reasonably up to date system that doesn't get in my way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I run workstation with Gnome. KDE is fine, and fedora implements it in vanilla fashion without any tweaks, which is good. I personally stopped using KDE because it doesn’t always work the way I want it to, and Gnome does. Games can easily be swapped between monitors if it opens on the wrong one initially. Gnome took some getting used to but it’s fantastic. Give it a shot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm really happy with KDE, I love how customizable it is and I also mostly prefer KDE software. Gnome is cool, but it's not for me. But I'll give Fedora Workstation a shot, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Use fedora KDE then, they are working on making it the same status as fedora workstation. You will not lose out on anything by using the KDE iso. Well except gnome and gnome related packages, of which you can install any one of if you want them later permalink fedilink source parent [–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Just my two cents I could only get my Ryzen 5 5600X and RTX 3080 to run games reliability on EndeavourOS. Tried PopOS, Kubuntu and Fedora KDE spin and all those had issues after a while or failed to run games out of the box and following wikis/guides permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Believe it or not, when I had my old 2060 laptop I used EndeavourOS for the same reason. But now I’m on a full AMD system, and the quirks of nvidia are no longer an issue for me. So yeah, good two cents. Everyone’s Linux journey involves some trial and error and finding what works for you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) why not ubuntu? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Debian > Ubuntu. Less extra stuff shoveled in and while not bleeding edge it's not a dinosaur. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) yes, i like debian as well. just havent used in a few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It keeps getting better. Better HW support, newer packages, no Canonical corporate crap. I run it on my gaming machine, work laptop, server, nas, and a 2013 netbook. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago Yes i know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago lol no. Canonical has left a bad taste in my mouth far too many times. Snaps are generally awful, collecting analytics without user knowledge at one point. If I was going to use something Ubuntu based it would be mint, but I prefer a native vanilla gnome experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you use Fedora Workstation or Silverblue? Is the KDE version fine to use? I'm pretty tempted to switch, I just want a reasonably up to date system that doesn't get in my way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I run workstation with Gnome. KDE is fine, and fedora implements it in vanilla fashion without any tweaks, which is good. I personally stopped using KDE because it doesn’t always work the way I want it to, and Gnome does. Games can easily be swapped between monitors if it opens on the wrong one initially. Gnome took some getting used to but it’s fantastic. Give it a shot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm really happy with KDE, I love how customizable it is and I also mostly prefer KDE software. Gnome is cool, but it's not for me. But I'll give Fedora Workstation a shot, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Use fedora KDE then, they are working on making it the same status as fedora workstation. You will not lose out on anything by using the KDE iso. Well except gnome and gnome related packages, of which you can install any one of if you want them later permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I run workstation with Gnome. KDE is fine, and fedora implements it in vanilla fashion without any tweaks, which is good. I personally stopped using KDE because it doesn’t always work the way I want it to, and Gnome does. Games can easily be swapped between monitors if it opens on the wrong one initially. Gnome took some getting used to but it’s fantastic. Give it a shot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm really happy with KDE, I love how customizable it is and I also mostly prefer KDE software. Gnome is cool, but it's not for me. But I'll give Fedora Workstation a shot, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Use fedora KDE then, they are working on making it the same status as fedora workstation. You will not lose out on anything by using the KDE iso. Well except gnome and gnome related packages, of which you can install any one of if you want them later permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm really happy with KDE, I love how customizable it is and I also mostly prefer KDE software. Gnome is cool, but it's not for me. But I'll give Fedora Workstation a shot, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Use fedora KDE then, they are working on making it the same status as fedora workstation. You will not lose out on anything by using the KDE iso. Well except gnome and gnome related packages, of which you can install any one of if you want them later permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Use fedora KDE then, they are working on making it the same status as fedora workstation. You will not lose out on anything by using the KDE iso. Well except gnome and gnome related packages, of which you can install any one of if you want them later permalink fedilink source parent
[–] keyez@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Just my two cents I could only get my Ryzen 5 5600X and RTX 3080 to run games reliability on EndeavourOS. Tried PopOS, Kubuntu and Fedora KDE spin and all those had issues after a while or failed to run games out of the box and following wikis/guides permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Believe it or not, when I had my old 2060 laptop I used EndeavourOS for the same reason. But now I’m on a full AMD system, and the quirks of nvidia are no longer an issue for me. So yeah, good two cents. Everyone’s Linux journey involves some trial and error and finding what works for you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Believe it or not, when I had my old 2060 laptop I used EndeavourOS for the same reason. But now I’m on a full AMD system, and the quirks of nvidia are no longer an issue for me. So yeah, good two cents. Everyone’s Linux journey involves some trial and error and finding what works for you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) why not ubuntu? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Debian > Ubuntu. Less extra stuff shoveled in and while not bleeding edge it's not a dinosaur. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) yes, i like debian as well. just havent used in a few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It keeps getting better. Better HW support, newer packages, no Canonical corporate crap. I run it on my gaming machine, work laptop, server, nas, and a 2013 netbook. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago Yes i know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago lol no. Canonical has left a bad taste in my mouth far too many times. Snaps are generally awful, collecting analytics without user knowledge at one point. If I was going to use something Ubuntu based it would be mint, but I prefer a native vanilla gnome experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Debian > Ubuntu. Less extra stuff shoveled in and while not bleeding edge it's not a dinosaur. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) yes, i like debian as well. just havent used in a few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It keeps getting better. Better HW support, newer packages, no Canonical corporate crap. I run it on my gaming machine, work laptop, server, nas, and a 2013 netbook. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago Yes i know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) yes, i like debian as well. just havent used in a few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It keeps getting better. Better HW support, newer packages, no Canonical corporate crap. I run it on my gaming machine, work laptop, server, nas, and a 2013 netbook. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago Yes i know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It keeps getting better. Better HW support, newer packages, no Canonical corporate crap. I run it on my gaming machine, work laptop, server, nas, and a 2013 netbook. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago Yes i know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago lol no. Canonical has left a bad taste in my mouth far too many times. Snaps are generally awful, collecting analytics without user knowledge at one point. If I was going to use something Ubuntu based it would be mint, but I prefer a native vanilla gnome experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 2 years ago* second serious option for most people permalink fedilink source parent