all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Okay, but who is the seamstress, because that costume is awesome and they don't make themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Fun fact, those are called "karhukainen" in Finnish. A direct (but loose) translation would be "bearly", "bearlike" or something else bear related.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Very loose. The finnish equivalent for those words would be "karhumainen". I'm not sure there is a single-word translation for the "-kainen" suffix.

    It doesn't really work the same way "-mainen" does, it's similar, but results in a word that has a more definite meaning.

    "Lapsimainen" would mean childlike or childish, while "lapsukainen" only ever refers to an actual child in an endeared way (or if used to describe an adult, would be like saying "my sweet summer child" in english).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    The Finnish suffix "-kainen" is used to create nouns that refer to things or beings associated with a particular quality or characteristic. Even though we don't necessarily mentally associate it with a similar meaning as "-mainen", it still is. Hence the translation of "bearlike" is close enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Close enough, but not closest. I would say "Bearie" is closer. You wouldn't call an actual bear "bearlike" but you might name it "Bearie".

    I didn't say "mainen" and "kainen" are dissimilar, but they ARE different. By about the same amount as the difference between doglike/doggy and doggie.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    A costume that will last for years - even in the vacuum of space.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Tbf they are fascinating but also scary in a way

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh right, now we’re claiming tardigrades are “biology”

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    ...they are? They are literally living organisms with brains, legs, mouth etc.. How does a tardigrade not fall into biology?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments