Science Memes

parent

[+] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

no i just don't fucking understand why the naked woman matters here.

Could be fucking anything, a pile of a billion dollars. Three turtles, or a goat, it's the same joke.

hideshow 8 child comments

parent

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I don't think it's the same joke when it's three turtles or a goat, because the joke is "I think I can get close enough...to engage in unspecified sex acts with this woman."

You think the same chemicals that turned the frickin frogs gay is responsible for this aversion to sexual thoughts? "Could it not be a naked woman? That clutches my pearls."

parent

[+] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

“I think I can get close enough…to engage in unspecified sex acts with this woman.”

that's what i would assume, but then again it never states anything, so this is like walking into a fucking storage shed and seeing a colonoscopy going on. It's just fucking weird.

parent

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

You objection is noted Mr. Spock. Man your station, please.

parent

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

also, if the woman is naked, does that mean the mathematician, engineer, and physicist are also naked? Because that would make a lot more sense.

parent

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

The mathematician is naked, something about pure and direct truth. The physicist is wearing a bow tie, chippendale cuffs and a banana hammock. The engineer has on his new invention: Assful chaps.

parent

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago

i like this interpretation of it.

parent

[–] RoosterBoy@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Exactly, it's the same joke regardless so why get bent out of shape over it?

parent

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

i mean yeah, i guess so, but that's not what im confused over.

I just want to know why specifically it was written with a nude woman? It never alluded to anything in particular.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] Rev3rze@feddit.nl 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is it really that confusing? If it had said there was a pot of gold the implication is clear that the person who reaches it will be rich. You ask "why a nude woman?" and the answer is simply because, just like being rich, desiring a sexual partner is a common desire.