null comments on Surging Loblaw boycott shows customer anger with grocery giant, says Mount Pearl organizer

submitted 2 years ago by lautan@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

Needs = laws?

They'll oust a CEO who doesn't fill that need. No legal action required.

parent

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Ah, I see you read the article. Now we're back at the start and you can continue to go in circles without me.

parent

[–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

Huh? You claimed that "need" = "law" -- which is clearly nonsense.

That's where we are.

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4