There are important distinctions politicians and people are glossing over when they talk about banning children from social media. https://open.substack.com/pub/billhulet/p/how-to-disengage-from-propaganda?r=4ot1q2&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Is this an AI that reads the first sentence of every comment without reading the rest, and can't understand context and details?
This is a great example why properly presenting data is important.
People today DON'T read, and that is why your graph/figure game has to be on point.
Why are we linking to substack articles when we can link directly to the study in question?
I have a stem degree. I always want to see the raw data to make my own conclusions, not be spoon fed a narrative that was written by authors with potential bias they are trying to fit to the data. Out of habit, I look at the data before reading, and I just happened to notice the error in the graph. The substack article only presents a single graph from the full study, and there is way more data there in the full study.