▲ 161 ▼ Jagmeet Singh resigning as NDP leader after losing his seat, his party routed (nationalpost.com) submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/canada@lemmy.ca 73 comments fedilink hide all child comments NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh suffered a resounding defeat on election night, losing his own seat, his party reduced to a single-digit seat count.
[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) NDP aren't even a major party anymore with 7 seats, sadly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're not an "official party", but they still got 6% of the vote. But, because of FPTP they only got 2% of the seats. Bloc Quebecois got 6.4% of the vote and 6.7% of the seats. There are still a lot of people out there who would want to vote NDP, but who voted Liberal to achieve "anybody but Conservative". The plan worked, but I think they'd like some electoral reform. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4jd39g8y1o permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I completely agree to be clear. But "major party" means something in election parlance, and unfortunately because of all the required strategic voting, it means NDP won't be at the next debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) all the required strategic voting, Much of BC was lost through three-way ties that the blues won by a nose. It seems that, for some ridings, strategy wasn't strong enough. If two Oranges 'cross' to Red to give Mark a mandate, can they 'cross' back before the next election? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah I hope the fact that both the NDP and the LPC got screwed in BC on so many ridings causes their hopeful coalition government to actually implement voting reform this time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Yeah, this might actually be convincing to those in power now. The eternal problem with electoral reform is: why would you change a system which you just won with? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're not an "official party", but they still got 6% of the vote. But, because of FPTP they only got 2% of the seats. Bloc Quebecois got 6.4% of the vote and 6.7% of the seats. There are still a lot of people out there who would want to vote NDP, but who voted Liberal to achieve "anybody but Conservative". The plan worked, but I think they'd like some electoral reform. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4jd39g8y1o permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I completely agree to be clear. But "major party" means something in election parlance, and unfortunately because of all the required strategic voting, it means NDP won't be at the next debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) all the required strategic voting, Much of BC was lost through three-way ties that the blues won by a nose. It seems that, for some ridings, strategy wasn't strong enough. If two Oranges 'cross' to Red to give Mark a mandate, can they 'cross' back before the next election? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah I hope the fact that both the NDP and the LPC got screwed in BC on so many ridings causes their hopeful coalition government to actually implement voting reform this time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Yeah, this might actually be convincing to those in power now. The eternal problem with electoral reform is: why would you change a system which you just won with? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I completely agree to be clear. But "major party" means something in election parlance, and unfortunately because of all the required strategic voting, it means NDP won't be at the next debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) all the required strategic voting, Much of BC was lost through three-way ties that the blues won by a nose. It seems that, for some ridings, strategy wasn't strong enough. If two Oranges 'cross' to Red to give Mark a mandate, can they 'cross' back before the next election? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah I hope the fact that both the NDP and the LPC got screwed in BC on so many ridings causes their hopeful coalition government to actually implement voting reform this time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Yeah, this might actually be convincing to those in power now. The eternal problem with electoral reform is: why would you change a system which you just won with? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) all the required strategic voting, Much of BC was lost through three-way ties that the blues won by a nose. It seems that, for some ridings, strategy wasn't strong enough. If two Oranges 'cross' to Red to give Mark a mandate, can they 'cross' back before the next election? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah I hope the fact that both the NDP and the LPC got screwed in BC on so many ridings causes their hopeful coalition government to actually implement voting reform this time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Yeah, this might actually be convincing to those in power now. The eternal problem with electoral reform is: why would you change a system which you just won with? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah I hope the fact that both the NDP and the LPC got screwed in BC on so many ridings causes their hopeful coalition government to actually implement voting reform this time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Yeah, this might actually be convincing to those in power now. The eternal problem with electoral reform is: why would you change a system which you just won with? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Yeah, this might actually be convincing to those in power now. The eternal problem with electoral reform is: why would you change a system which you just won with? permalink fedilink source parent