[–] 0 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

Not sure how I feel about them. On one hand they appear to allow pervy recordings, but banning something like this could open the way to prevent public recordings altogether by the back door. There has been ways to do covert recording in a similar way without the glasses in the past, so I think the main change is the blurring of special purpose hardware and everyday hardware.

I feel a specific offence for convert targeted recording of a person for sexual reasons would be better than just banning smart glasses.

It might actually be the fact that Facebook are the ones making that makes me not like them.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Am I alone in not wanting to put my username into that field? If they don't have it will they then just decide that it's now a good time to scrape it? Or are they going to record that it was searched?

  • source
  • Remember that white goods typically have longer warranties, so don't forget to use it if needed! After I convinced my parents to do it, the tech said it was a design issue and ended up replacing the heater with a larger one (I didn't even know they had them.)

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Low powered stuff probably requires more Dev or specialist software, with a off the shelf mini pc you can just put windows with kiosk mode on it. In terms of support time it's probably cheaper than cheaper hardware.

  • source
  • view more: next ›