top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 2 years ago (6 children)

If your country persecutes individual piracy. Mine doesn't.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Our ISP sends 3 strike letters :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    That is supposedly the case in Australia as well but I haven't got a letter from telstra since around 2004 and I have never used a VPN and watch all my shows and movies via torrents so either I'm extremely lucky or they stopped bothering.

    Though recently I started paying the $4 / month for Real Debrid for better streaming performance, which is just as good as a VPN for torrent anonymity. I used to be fundamentally against the idea of paying anything to pirate but honestly this is worth it, I've even been able to watch a few shows that had 0 seeders because they were previously cached.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Scroll down and there's a section about Australia on here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_Buyers_Club

    Basically, they fucked it up so bad in Aus no one's ever tried again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That says their error was trying American threats "we got you dead to rights, tell us your income and we'll tell you how much to pay our we'll sue for punitive damages"

    Which isn't legal in Australia. They would have been ok if they had asked to send a letter saying "stop it or pay us a reasonable amount for one person viewing the film once" but of course actual damages aren't enough for film companies

    They were too greedy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Yeah basically. But part of why no one has tried again is because the judge made it very clear he wasn't going to just roll over and let them pull their BS. Including setting a bond of $600k for them to even try litigating it. Another part of it is that ISPs used to hand out IP addresses and PII in response to requests from media companies. This was found to be in breach of privacy laws and now those companies would have to apply for court orders, proving malfeasance, to get that information.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 58 points 2 years ago (8 children)
  • [–] 93 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    let's say that VPNs are compromised and "they" know that you're downloading "illegally"

    in order to prosecute, "they" have to prove you're a pirate and show how they know

    would they compromise their backDoor to go after a tiny pirate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Will they collect data on you to profile you and your activities and use that in the future? Yes.

    And that's why the only thing I use my VPN for is piracy. Don't really have a good reason to push anything else through it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago

    In fairness I doubt the NSA give a single solitary fuck about piracy and aren't about to give themselves up over a telesync rip of Beetlejuice 2.

    But probably best to plan 9/11 part 2 over something a bit more secure.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Title is probably true, but also it's less likely for the NSA to leak your info than say an ISP that openly sells your info. I highly doubt that the NSA sees someone pirating Photoshop as a priority. VPNs can help with preventing a random ad from logging your real loose location, have built in DNS ad block, open up region locked content plus a list of other benefits.

    VPNs absolutely help with general privacy, like not putting your personal phone number on a public registry. They are not intended to perfectly hide you from a super power's intelligence agency lol

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 49 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don’t use a VPN because my government has acknowledged that an IP address cannot identify what individual was using it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P I2P

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago

    Instructions unclear, VPN'd into my own home network.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    Even Haru's billionaire ass can't afford all these subscriptions 😭

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Who is the original artist?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    A VPN is just essentially a change in ISP.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    My country doesn't care, so it's not necessary

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    And make sure it's a VPN that supports port forwarding. Sharing is caring.

    or just use Usenet.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I use Comcast VPN cheaper than mullvad /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    i never hav to use one lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And please don't use anime girls to refer to every fucking thing in the world

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I thought you don't need a VPN for things like usenet

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›