all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 79 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is how books were written 100 years ago, you had to spend like the first third explaining why everyone else is wrong before getting to the part where you claim to be right.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    I initially didn't do enough of that in my PhD thesis (CS, about some weird non-frame-based imaging tech that is still only of academic interest), and my committee demanded I add more stake-claiming favorable comparisons to other tech to my introduction before I submitted.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 75 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Hoofta.

    Not that I need to tell anybody here, but if there's an arena with bigger egos than politics, it's academia. I'd pay money just to watch the carnage.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Could someone do a dissertation about exactly that?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 157 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    "Your Thesis Is Wrong and You Should Feel Bad: On Cherry-Picking and the Reproducibility Crisis in Academic Research"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Attack the judges, jury, and executioners? Bold strategy, Cotton.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago

    Earn bonus points with the phrase “your reach exceeds your grasp”

  • source