top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 125 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I am a little biased because I've been using Debian professionally for many years now but we don't deserve Debian. It is fantastically stable and reliable and makes an excellent platform for running your services off of. If you are at all interested in offering some time and energy to the open source community, consider adopting a Debian package!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm thinking about a Linux laptop with FOSS software for my business actually, Lemmy's relentless horde of pro-Linux propaganda has won me over

    (OK I've always liked FOSS I've just never taken the jump)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    ONE OF US! ONE OF US!

    but seriously, modern FOSS distros (yes, debian is modern, damnit!) are amazingly good. you have an exceptionally high probablility of switching and staying switched.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm looking forward to it!

    Side note: anyone got recommendations for business software? I've started browsing the FOSS community here for ideas but I'm not sure what QuickBooks alternatives exist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • I'm an accountant.

    The best accounting software will be the one your accountant uses.

    When clients are on the same platform that I use internally everything just matches up and it's beautiful and elegant and amazing.

    When clients are using something else it just doesn't fit our workflows and it's just more of a fuck around, which of course the client gets charged for.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    A quick Google shows Quickbooks to be cloud-based accounting software. For FOSS accounting, GnuCash exists so you could try that (it can also run on Windows and macOS). However, it's unlikely to have feature parity so if you like the added convenience that Quickbooks offers, see if you can use Quickbooks in a browser. Being cloud-based, they would probably build a browser version before building a Linux desktop app. If they don't and you need to run a Windows desktop app on Linux, you can probably do this using Bottles (which uses Wine and Proton under the hood, the tech that enables the Steam Deck).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's how I feel about arch, it's not "stable" but the few issues I've had they typically have it fixed with an update within hours.

    I do have to clarify when I switched to arch from windows my entire computer was brand new and practically no other distro booted or if it installed it dumped me to a black screen.

    After running my server on archlinux with the stable kernel for 7 years I did install Debian on my new server. Zfs just required an older lts kernel than I could get on arch without a ton of hassle. I didn't need it on my Mac mini with an external hard drive plugged in. From my experience it's not very different to maintain compared to arch but it's nice having built in automation instead of writing my own.

    Man it's weird using a system of what I can guess is a bunch of bash scripts on Debian to set things up compared to just using the tools built into and written for systemd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    it's not "stable"

    "stable" in this case means that it doesn't change often. Debian stable is called that because no major version changes are performed during the entire cycle of a release.

    It doesn't mean "stable" as in "never crashes", although Debian is good at that too.

    Arch is definitely not "stable" using that definition!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    I just want a Debian-based distro with KDE that's not poisoned by Canonical's nonsense

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I still remember this nice 'feature' of XScreenSaver.

    However, as of 2016 Iceweasel is Firefox ESR again.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The packages in Debian are really old. It's awful.

    I was looking at my xzutils package the other month. "So outdated," I thought, envying the cool hip trendy Arch users.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Yeah, I had to bail. FreeBSD was awesome for stable yet bleeding-edge packages, a perfect blend of downloading binaries and compiling from source (when needed) with everything in sync.

    These days I’m using Alpine Linux almost exclusively, but I miss the convenience of FreeBSD and wish it wasn’t being left behind by the Kool Kidz™.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Tell me you're an opinionated novice without telling me you're an opinionated novice.

    (edit:specificity)

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    I have a really old computer that still gets the job done, and just getting up to Bullseye broke it a bit.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    SOFTWARE WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE STABLE

    Someone with a case of brain rot.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Mentoning Iceweasel in 2024?! Where did you find this meme?! Debian stable?!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    LMDE (Linux Mint Debian Edition) is a wonderful self-hosting platform.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    It makes a great headless server

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Getthefuckouttamyfacewiththisridiculousbullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Debian gives you a choice though. If you want stability, install the stable release. If you want newer packages, install the testing release. Just be sure to get security updates from unstable (sid) if you do that.

    "stable" in this context means that stuff doesn't change often. It doesn't mean "stable" as in reliable / never crashes, although Debian is good at that too.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It is possible though to get newer versions using flathub or somethibg, right? (I know very little about linux, but I'm thinking of switching from win10 to debian next year.)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    1. No better time than the present
    2. Yes there are ways of acquiring the latest packages even on Debian stable. Usually I end up compiling that stuff myself
    3. If you're at all unsure if you want to deal with Debian not pushing the latest and greatest updates you do have options such as running Debian Testing or MX Linux (which itself is based on Debian Testing)
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    1. No better time than the present

    Look, I'm already trying (and kinda succedding) to avoid doing some hard tasks I have to do, don't push me further into the rabbit hole.😆

    Ugh, now I'm considering doing it in 2 weeks, what have you donee

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Sweet. Welcome to the cult of Debian.

    We (Debian users and contributors) are inevitable. Our quiet satisfied computing cannot be stopped, only delayed.

    We should consider getting some fancy robes and a few club houses, though. The only thing that can make Debian better is cookies and tea.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    This makes Debian look kinda good actually...

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›