all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 70 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Respect to the computer scientist who sorted that out. That has got to be an extremely satisfying bug to fix.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    As a software engineer, I'm still trying to figure out their build pipeline. That thing has got to be interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No documentation, imagine! The original designers--dead. This person had to reverse engineer every aspect of that system, though I can't imagine that it has more than, say, 64KB of RAM. Still an enormous amount of work but not like trying to figure out how an iPhone works without any documentation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/news/voyager-mission-anniversary-computers-command-data-attitude-control/

    According to the above, the software was written in FORTRAN.

    There's probably at least one warehouse somewhere full of green bar sprocketed teletype / dot matrix paper with the source code on it, if not also magnetic tapes. And that assumes they haven't archived it in other places and formats in the last ~50 years.

    70kB though. That's a huge amount of memory for 1977. Low-end personal computers were still selling with less than that 10 years later.

    That said, the article doesn't distinguish ROM and RAM, so I wonder how much of that is ROM. ROM is and was far cheaper.

    Also, that 70 might be a rounding up of 65536 bytes, which is 64k, so you might be spot on with your guess there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Ha my sister had to learn FORTRAN for her research science work. Lot of long-term, old survey tools use it still. Apparently it was... not a pleasant experience to learn the language haha.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This legitimately made me sad when I heard they might lose this satellite. It's the farthest humans have ever sent anything beyond Earth, and it might always be the case. The science data coming back from this is invaluable.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    We'll surely get faster. Remember that Voyager 1 actually made a pass around one of the planets (Jupiter?) specifically to slow it down so that it could start gathering data. It would not be (relatively speaking) hard to send something out at a far greater velocity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That fly by of Jupiter was the original purpose of the mission.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I am always fascinated by the magnitudes nasa overengineers their missions. The Mars rovers for example. They always get so much more out of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We can absolutely go way faster. The fastest thing we've ever built is currently the parker solar probe. Relative to the sun, it's traveling so fast it could do a flyby of earths entire width in (I'm just guessing, don't quote me) probably a couple seconds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Incredible that we can still receive the signal after all this time over such a vast distance. I wish we made our current devices with such longevity in mind 😉😄

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    How the actual fuck is a signal being sent 24 billion kilometres? That's nuts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I just don't get how it doesn't get destroyed by random space shit. I get space is infinitely empty but it's also infinitely full too, right...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Infinitely empty AFAIK.

    Interstellar space is similar to atoms and the electron cloud, some tiny amount of matter and a whole heap of SFA.

    (Someone get at me with the actual numbers, but I'm leaning toward space being more sparse by percentage than an atom.)

    The main solar system objects were accounted for and closely avoided, now it's a very roomy area to float through alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    But aren't there like a bunch of little rocks from like asteroids and stuff? That's what I never got even for launches from earth, why isn't everything up there just getting peppered nonstop from debris. I guess space is really just that empty

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Debris like that will tend to concentrate around a gravitational focus. There’s a lot more of the space rocks and stuff you’re worried about within the inner solar system than towards the edges where there’s little gravity to keep those objects from falling further into the solar system. That’s why JWST had micro meteor impact damage so early after its launch.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Headline implicates that it was returning non-science data so far lol

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Pushing software updates with an almost 24 hour latency, nice

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    This makes me genuinely happy. Not much uplifting news actually uplifts me these days. This is one of the rare headlines that does.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I thought i thought this was solved weeks ago?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They figured out how to resolve it weeks ago.

    It has taken this long to implement the results, and to get usable data flowing again

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm sure it wasn't aliens :: x files music ::

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's what I thought too, until I read

    The announcement that Voyager 1’s instruments were returning data again came two days after JPL announced the passing of Ed Stone, who served as Voyager’s project scientist from the mission’s inception in 1972 until 2022.

    And realized it was the ghost of Ed Stone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments