If you stick to the premise that the portals exist in a universe with GR, then we can pay much know that space-time is locally flat in and around at least the middle parts of the portal. We know this because things don't get fucked up when they're going through.
Most likely he dictates this shit to his social media handler on the jail phone. That's assuming these messages are even coming from him.
Jesus was a man who travelled through the land.
A hard working man and brave.
He said to the rich, "Give your goods to the poor."
And they laid Jesus Christ in his grave.
In this particular case, there are also 5th amendment issues with the Miranda warnings.
The CBP officers repeatedly ignored the defendant's requests for a lawyer, and they continued to question him anyway. Then, the defendant allegedly told them the "unlock" / duress code.
There's existing case law in the US that phone unlock codes are "testimony" within the 5th amendment's right to remain silent, so a search warrant cannot compel someone to divulge them. (This is different from a phone unlock fingerprint, which can be compelled with a warrant).
I halfway expect the government to argue somewhat against this case law, but who knows? DOJ is now scraping the very bottom of the barrel to find lawyers, so sometimes it's hard to tell if they have any kind of coherent plan at all.
He's actually a Florida Man from Florida these days. He only pretends to be an Alabamian to hold down an Alabama Senate seat.
At least MSVC has a number for every diagnostic that you can search.
math.h provides log() for the natural logarithm, and log10() for the common logarithm. There is no ln() unless you write it yourself.
Here's the plan for how the SAVE Act is intended to work:
- SAVE Act requires voter ID, but it actually requires a photo ID that says "US citizen" on the ID.
- For most people, the only identity documents that do that are passport books and passport cards.
- Bad news: By and large, Americans don't have passports. Passport adoption is really low compared to Europe.
- Suddenly a bunch of Americans have to apply for passports to vote. Many will have trouble gathering the required documents, including birth certificates and marriage licenses (for name changes). Many won't get it done in time.
- What a disaster! So many people can't vote!
- But wait! SAVE Act comes in with a solution! States can be exempted from the ID bullshit.
- But there's a catch! To get the exemption, your state must have been turning over its voter rolls to the feds, quarterly, since July, 2025.
- If your state, like every, uh, blue state, hasn't been doing that... Well, I guess it just sucks to suck. There's no way to become compliant now, and the SAVE Act hasn't even been enacted yet.
In Texas, individual precinct judges are granted extremely broad police power to ensure the proper decorum in and orderly operation of their polling places. And this power is independent of the county sheriff, the constables, and any local police department
Which is really strange, because the voter rolls are public information in every state of the Union. You can just buy them, and many political action groups do.
Remember folks: they're making these admissions because they don't want the judge to order them to turn over even more damaging documents in discovery.
So you can normally be held liable for telling the police bad information. For example, it's a crime to lie to the feds. So if he told them the self destruct code, but told them it was the unlock code, maybe in normal circumstances there could be some liability.
But this case is interesting, because the phone code "testimony" was given under multiple severe Miranda violations. So that's a whole 5th amendment clusterfuck. The normal remedy for a 5th violation is the statements are suppressed. But a whole separate criminal charge is not a "statement" to suppress, is it?
I guess on the other hand, if you properly suppress the fact that he told them the code in the first place, how do you prove he had any hand in "destroying" the property?
While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).
Transcript:
Q Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, Arby's --
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A Arby's sells roast beef.
Q Right. Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q What is the expression trying to convey?
A It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A Yeah.
Q She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there? You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants. Yes.
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q You're not making a slur about her?
A No.
Q You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A Yes. That's correct. That's correct.
Q Why are you laughing?
A Because I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A I just think it's so funny. I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more:
next ›