you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 70 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Respect to the computer scientist who sorted that out. That has got to be an extremely satisfying bug to fix.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    As a software engineer, I'm still trying to figure out their build pipeline. That thing has got to be interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No documentation, imagine! The original designers--dead. This person had to reverse engineer every aspect of that system, though I can't imagine that it has more than, say, 64KB of RAM. Still an enormous amount of work but not like trying to figure out how an iPhone works without any documentation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/news/voyager-mission-anniversary-computers-command-data-attitude-control/

    According to the above, the software was written in FORTRAN.

    There's probably at least one warehouse somewhere full of green bar sprocketed teletype / dot matrix paper with the source code on it, if not also magnetic tapes. And that assumes they haven't archived it in other places and formats in the last ~50 years.

    70kB though. That's a huge amount of memory for 1977. Low-end personal computers were still selling with less than that 10 years later.

    That said, the article doesn't distinguish ROM and RAM, so I wonder how much of that is ROM. ROM is and was far cheaper.

    Also, that 70 might be a rounding up of 65536 bytes, which is 64k, so you might be spot on with your guess there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Ha my sister had to learn FORTRAN for her research science work. Lot of long-term, old survey tools use it still. Apparently it was... not a pleasant experience to learn the language haha.

  • source
  • parent