A new messaging app is in development, and the project is described as "an open source WhatsApp for the Fediverse."

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 2 years ago (1 child)

something something 15 competing standards

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    unfortunately matrix sucks revolt isn’t federated and irc is outdated so

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I just learned about Matrix recently. Seems like something that'd be good. What sucks about it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Besides the main implementation synapse being slow, the new implementation dendrite is unfinished but progressing.

    But technical standards aside, the hassle of managing encryption keys is too buggy and confusing IMO. That'll deter most people I feel.

    I want it to be great but it just isn't there yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I personally really like Matrix, but there are a few outstanding complaints about it. The biggest one is that the reference implementation everyone uses by default is known to be bloated and slow, and poor at scaling. Server admins have had a huge challenge of supporting a large amount of data for things like room history, which in the past required propagation to every server hosting every participant. The protocol itself has been described by some developers as overtly complex.

    Some of this seems to be improving, particularly with development of a Go-based backend implementation, Dendrite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (11 children)

    IRC is only "outdated" if you make it so by using outdated networks like libera.chat that refuse to implement the newer standards that have been available for years.

    Oh and XMPP is a thing and works great.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    For some weird reason many people just plain ignore the existance of XMPP when they're discussing decentralized protocols. Is it because Matrix outshadowed it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Matrix is getting better on fast peace, we need to give it another yew years to fix biggest holes I guess.

    ActivityPub based chat is going to suck much. Like basing chat on RSS or FTP, it can be done but why. Unless we're talking just about replicating Instagram-like DMs then maybeee? But I still would like to just add link to Matrix in bio instead of having chat in yet another place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Oh boy... Another messenger... Yay...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Nobody is telling you to use it. This originally spun out of development of a messaging app just for Pixelfed, but evolved when the dev realized it could be made to work with any Fediverse account, not just his own server project.

    An optimistic view is that it could end up opening the door for end-to-end encryption to come to private messages in Fediverse servers, over time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I think what @deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml is trying to explain is that Mastodon and Lemmy for example may be able to implement Sup as a part of their softwares too. Currently if you try to DM someone on Lemmy, the options are a Matrix redirect, or Private Messages designated as not secured.

    Though I do wonder about the viability of this. People would still need to set up with Sup to receive messages, at least as I understand it. As a result, this would run into a similar problem as matrix, just without needing to use a different federated server and login I suppose.

    This would also require that project leads for AP softwares would want to accept the service as a part of their distribution, assuming it even is implmented in such a manner.

    TL;DR it's hard to say anything for certain when details seem to be slim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    With the open nature of the fediverse I actually see some potential here. Right now there isn’t a single messenger that I truly like. They’re all just different shades of okay or worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Mobile-first, requires phone number, proprietary server-side, google play market.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Desktop app works fine tbh.

    Phone numbers required for now. Usernames potentially on the horizon per sms removal update.

    Server side code is open source and available at Signal Server Github.

    Also available on iOS. Android has an apk download so you dont need Google Play.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Seems you edited your comment to add new points. Lemmy doesn't notify users about changes to comments/posts they replied to, unfortunately.

    Phone numbers required for now. Usernames potentially on the horizon per sms removal update.

    Good to know. I prefer to never use my phone number for sign ups.

    Server side code is open source and available at Signal Server Github.

    They seem to put a lot of effort to centralize their app though - you can't setup your own server and talk to other signal users.

    Android has an apk download so you dont need Google Play.

    Yes, but you need to figure out how to verify signature keys on android + manual updates, it's just inconvinent if you compare it to F-Droid Signal devs so dislike for no good reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wonder how it'll compare to Matrix.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I think it's intended to be more like WhatsApp, in the sense that you use it for one-on-one chats or messaging small friend groups. I don't think it's a current goal to try to take on Matrix / Element.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm for it, plus I like the name.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    What's Sup?

    Nothing much, you?

    No, what's, Sup?

    ... Just chillen...

    Visible anger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The name makes me think of the Bro app from Silicon Valley

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago*

    I'm excited for it. I'm hoping it becomes a federated, self-hostable Signal.

    It's way easier to sell friends and family on yet another messager when you tell them "look, it comes with a twitter/facebook/instagram/reddit too!"

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do we if it will have scope to do group chats at all or well?

    Seems to me that private group chats are significant piece missing from the fedi, especially as they seem to me to be a reasonable alternative platform structure compared to all the doom scrolling engagement stuff that the Fedi has so far more or less sought to simply clone.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm much more excited about Veilid than another server-based thing, even if it's federated servers. Fully peer-to-peer seems like the way to go for direct conversations.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Actually, for now @dansup@mastodon.social is working on an activityPub library called #pubkit https://pubkit.net

    https://mastodon.social/@dansup/110887874008773474

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 years ago

    He's working on multiple things at once. Where he finds the energy, I don't know, but PubKit, Sup, and a few other things are all happening right now.

    This one article is part of a series where I'm hoping to put up one feature per day of what he's been working on. Pixelfed is notoriously hard to cover, because the lead dev is so active.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    It seems to be based on the existing Pixelfed php code that uses ActivityPub. In theory the Libervia AP gateway would probably make it work with XMPP, but I suspect the use of libsignal will ultimately still prevent it. Maybe once both sides speak MLS it will be possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›