all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 87 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Sounds like they didn't try very hard.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I can believe it, because of how integrated everything is at Apple. You probably need to bring a lot of iCloud support over (App Store, backups, apis), but that may also require supporting applications and configurations

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    im not fully convinced its api, as there are several times a dev or themselves have proved connecting to the apple service was possible. with message, beeper proved it was possible to chat with imessage users. with icloud, backups could be accessed via an internet browser (therefore theres an already existing api that is platform agnostic as it runs in a browser.)

    apple could even just make a PWA and instantly have access to the same api that browsers use to access its cloud on its own, and supporting auto cloud sync wouldn't even have to be at an OS level.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago*

    Well, it's not like they said they gave it their best, and I really doubt they did.

    They might have had a couple of trained monkeys bashing typewriters for 3 years in a room with the sign "Apple Watch for Android team" on the door for all we know. They just said they were "working on it" before scrapping the idea

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    It’s based on a specific piece of hardware in the iPhone called the Secure Enclave that basically keeps all of your PHI in a place that nobody but you can get it. It doesn’t transfer when you get a new phone, for instance, and has to be recreated. I’m betting that an Android app involved some sort of emulator, performance was awful, and they gave up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Apple is full of shit. I freaking doubt it'll take them a year.

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tim-cook-says-buy-mom-210347694.html#:~:text=Benzinga-,Tim%20Cook%20Says%20'Buy%20Your%20Mom%20An%20iPhone'%20If%20You,Not%20A%20Priority%20For%20Apple&text=Apple%20Inc.,showcased%20his%20sense%20of%20humor.

    During a question-and-answer session, a journalist raised the issue of the iPhone’s incompatibility with rich communication services (RCS) messaging, preventing the seamless sharing of video clips with their Android-using mom. It’s been a longstanding issue between Apple and Android devices. Cook acknowledged that it isn’t a top priority for the company. If the reporter wanted to fix the issue, Cook joked, “buy your mom an iPhone.”

    Pardon me if we don't give you the benefit of the doubt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Garmin smartwatches are good, support both Apple and Android and have their own App Store store for the watches that works with both mobile OS platforms.

    It’s not clear what critical features couldn’t work for Apple on Android.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I stand by the Instinct. All of the smart features I need, and a 2 week battery life. I just wish they would release a model that doesn't look like a G-Shock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We couldn't because... reasons?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Calling bullshit. Whether you like their products or not, you gotta admit that some of the best software engineers in the world work at Apple. If they really wanted to do it, it would get done.

    Plus, “investigating” an idea for three years is most definitely not the same as actively trying.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    “We spent 3 years exploring whether spending the engineering effort to make it work the way we wanted on Android would end up making us more money in the long run, and decided it wouldn’t. Because we are a business, and that’s literally how we make every decision.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    It might be true, anything they have released outside their walled garden is pure crap, iTunes for Windows, Music for Android…

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago

    One one hand, ye ye old java dalvik

    On the other hand, proprietary Apple

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago

    It just doesn't work

  • source